PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026British Journal of Health Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

What matters to cardiac patients? The impact of linking life goals to health goals on patients' intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle: an online experiment

RIRenée V. H. IJzermanLeiden University Medical CenterRVRosalie van der VaartLeiden UniversityLBLinda D. BreemanLeiden University

Key Result

Linking life goals to health goals did not significantly increase intention-to-change-lifestyle compared to setting health goals alone in CVD patients (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.71-1.34; p=0.88).

Key Points

  • The study aims to investigate how linking life goals to health goals affects lifestyle change intentions in cardiovascular disease patients.
  • Conducted an online experimental study with 629 cardiovascular disease patients.
  • Patients were randomized into two groups: one setting only health goals and another setting life goals followed by health goals.
  • The intention-to-change-lifestyle was measured and analyzed using logistic regression.
  • Exercise goals were most commonly selected by participants in both groups at around 66%.
  • Higher preference for stress management was observed in the life-and-health-goal group compared to the health-goal group (17.3% vs. 9.3%).
  • Linking life goals to health goals showed heightened lifestyle change intentions in lower- and medium-educated patients.

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=629)

Randomization

randomized

Structured PICO

Does linking life goals to health goals improve intention-to-change-lifestyle in patients with cardiovascular disease?

P
Population
629 patients with cardiovascular disease (mean age 66.6, 39% female) randomized to a health-goal-group or life-and-health-goal-group in an online experiment.
I
Intervention
Life-and-health-goal-group (LHG): established a superordinate life goal using a structured shared decision-making tool ('Wat ertoe doet') involving guided reflection and visual selection, followed by setting a supporting subordinate health goal.
C
Comparator
Health-goal-group (HG): set a subordinate health goal within a specific lifestyle domain without prior life goal reflection (active usual-care comparator).
O
Outcome
Intention-to-change-lifestyle, measured directly after goal setting using two items on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (analyzed dichotomously as high [9-10] vs lower [≤8.5]).patient reported

Linking life goals to health goals did not significantly increase overall intention to change lifestyle in CVD patients, though it increased preference for stress management goals and showed potential benefit in lower- and medium-educated patients.

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 0.98 (95% CI 0.71–1.34)

p-value: p=0.88

Limitations

  • Self-reported diagnoses without medical record verification

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Guidelines advocate goal setting for promoting lifestyle changes in cardiovascular disease (CVD) patients. This study investigates 1) preferences in health and life goal domains in CVD patients, 2) the impact of linking life goals to health goals on intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle and explores 3) socio‐demographic and health‐related variables influencing intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle. Design Online experimental study. Methods Patients ( N = 629, mean age 66.6; 39% female) were randomized to health‐goal‐group ( HG ) or life‐and‐health‐goal‐group ( LHG ). HG set a health goal, and LHG first established a life goal and then set a supporting health goal. Directly after goal setting, the primary outcome, intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle, was measured and analysed using logistic regression (high: 9–10 vs. lower: ≤8.5), as were the secondary outcomes. Results Exercise goals were most frequently selected in LHG (66.0%) and HG (66.9%). Preference for selecting stress management was significantly higher in LHG (17.3%) than HG (9.3%), χ 2 (1) = 8.85, p = .003; OR = 2.05, 95%CI 1.27–3.30. The direct effect of goal‐setting condition on intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle was non‐significant (OR = .98, 95%CI .71–1.34, p = .88). In exploratory analyses, lower‐ and medium‐educated patients showed significantly higher intention when life and health goals were linked (OR = 2.55, 95%CI 1.03–6.27, p = .04, and OR = 2.47, 95%CI 1.15–5.30, p = .02, respectively). Perceived meaning in life was positively associated with intention. Conclusions No main effect of goal‐setting condition on intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle was found. Linking life goals to health goals increased preference for stress management and, in exploratory analyses, was associated with higher intention‐to‐change‐lifestyle among lower‐ and medium‐educated patients. Findings emphasize the relevance of personalized, value‐based goal setting within cardiac rehabilitation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

IJzerman et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in cardiovascular disease (CVD) (n=629). Linking life goals to health goals vs. Setting a health goal only was evaluated on intention-to-change-lifestyle (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71-1.34, p=0.88). Linking life goals to health goals did not significantly increase intention-to-change-lifestyle compared to setting health goals alone in CVD patients (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.71-1.34; p=0.88).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe48c1c9540dea810288https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.70056
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper