PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Neurospine3 citationsOpen Access

Optimal Positioning for Single-Position Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

View Full Paper
WLWorawat LimthongkulNPNatavut PrasertkulPPPakawas Praisarnti

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how different hip positions affect lumbar lordosis and spinal alignment during lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
  • Thirty healthy volunteers underwent lateral lumbar radiographs in different hip flexion configurations.
  • Five configurations were tested: neutral hips, 30° flexion of both hips, 30° flexion of right hip with left neutral, 60° flexion of both hips, and 60° flexion of right hip with left neutral.
  • Measurements included lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence.
  • Each position was compared to standing using paired t-tests.
  • All configurations resulted in a significant decrease in lumbar lordosis compared to standing.
  • The 30° flexion of the right hip with the left neutral (30FN) showed the smallest change in lumbar lordosis.
  • Pelvic tilt decreased and sacral slope increased in the 30FN position, indicating slight anterior pelvic rotation.
  • Intra- and interobserver reliability scores ranged from 0.92 to 0.99, confirming high measurement accuracy.

Abstract

Objective: To quantify the effect of different hip positions on lumbar lordosis (LL) and spinopelvic parameters in the right lateral decubitus position (RLDP) and identify the configuration that most closely replicates physiologic standing alignment during lateral lumbar interbody fusion in minimally invasive spinal surgery.Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers (15 males, 15 females; mean age, 27.8±8.6 years) underwent lateral lumbar radiographs in standing position and 5 RLDP configurations: neutral hips (NN), 30° flexion of both hips (30FF), 30° flexion of the right hip with left hip neutral (30FN), 60° flexion of both hips (60FF), and 60° flexion of the right hip with left hip neutral (60FN). LL, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic incidence (PI) were measured. Each position was compared to standing using paired t-tests. Intra- and interobserver reliability were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).Results: LL decreased significantly in all RLDP positions compared with standing (51.1°±3.8°). The 30FN position showed the smallest change (ΔLL=-4.9°, p<0.001), whereas 60FF showed the greatest (ΔLL=-15.0°, p<0.001). In 30FN, PT decreased (p=0.013) and SS increased (p=0.003), indicating mild anterior pelvic rotation. PI showed minimal variation across positions. Intra- and interobserver ICCs ranged from 0.92 to 0.99, confirming high measurement reliability.Conclusion: Hip position significantly influences lumbar and pelvic alignment in RLDP. Among tested configurations, the 30FN position (right hip flexed 30°, left neutral) showed the smallest numerical deviation from standing alignment and spinopelvic harmony relative to standing in RLDP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Limthongkul et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe57c1c9540dea81058fhttps://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2551540.770
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Incidence and Risk Factors for Lumbar Sympathetic Chain Injury After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2COMPARISON OF PSOAS MORPHOLOGY AND LUMBAR LORDOSIS IN DIFFERENT POSTURES2022 · 6 citations
  3. 3Sagittal Plane Considerations and the Pelvis in the Adult Patient2009 · 781 citations
  4. 4Should a Narrow Corridor Be a Contraindication for Performing Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Procedure or Not?2023 · 7 citations
  5. 5The effect of age on sagittal plane profile of the lumbar spine according to standing, supine, and various sitting positions2014 · 97 citations