PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes2 citations

Steroidal versus Non-steroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Propensity-Matched Multi-Network Nationwide Cohort Study

View Full Paper
TATalal AlmasMSMohamed SheligAAAhmed Al-Hindawi

Key Result

Finerenone use in patients with HFpEF was associated with a lower 1-year risk of heart failure exacerbation compared with spironolactone (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.54-0.74; p<0.001).

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the efficacy of finerenone and spironolactone in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
  • Retrospective observational cohort study using the TriNetX research network.
  • 1:1 propensity score matching of patients initiated on finerenone versus spironolactone.
  • Assessment of 1-year risks for heart failure exacerbation, acute kidney injury, electrolyte derangements, and cardiovascular outcomes.
  • Finerenone showed a significantly lower risk of heart failure exacerbation (HR = 0.63) compared to spironolactone.
  • All-cause mortality risk was reduced with finerenone (HR = 0.38).
  • Finerenone was also associated with a lower risk of hypokalemia (HR = 0.58).
  • Reduction in acute kidney injury risk was noted, significant across various subgroups.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=982)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does finerenone reduce heart failure exacerbations and mortality compared to spironolactone in patients with HFpEF?

P
Population
982 propensity-matched patients with HFpEF initiated on finerenone or spironolactone, evaluated for 1-year clinical outcomes.
E
Exposure
Finerenone
C
Comparator
Spironolactone (1:1 propensity score matched)
O
Outcome
1-year risk of heart failure exacerbationhard clinical

In a real-world propensity-matched cohort of patients with HFpEF, finerenone was associated with significantly lower 1-year risks of heart failure exacerbation, all-cause mortality, and hypokalemia compared to spironolactone.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.63 (95% CI 0.54–0.74)

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • Observational findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in randomized trials
  • Retrospective observational design
  • Findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in randomized trials

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Heart failure continues to portend significant morbidity and mortality within the United States. Data regarding the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. Finerenone, a non-steroidal MRA, has demonstrated reduction in hospitalizations in this population. However, the comparative efficacy of different MRA classes in these patients remains elusive. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using the TriNetX research network. We applied 1:1 propensity score matching to compare patients with HFpEF initiated on finerenone versus spironolactone. We examined 1-year risks of heart failure exacerbation, acute kidney injury, electrolyte derangements, and cardiovascular outcomes. Results We identified 254,417 patients with HFpEF and MRA use. After propensity score matching, each cohort contained 491 patients. Analysis revealed that finerenone use was associated with a significantly lower risk of heart failure exacerbation (HR = 0.63 95% CI: 0.54, 0.74, p 0.001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.38 95% CI: 0.23, 0.64, p 0.001), and hypokalemia (HR = 0.58 95% CI: 0.40, 0.85, p = 0.001). The aforementioned results, along with a reduction in AKI risk, were statistically significant after stratified subgroup analysis by DM and CKD. Conclusion In this large real-world HFpEF cohort, finerenone use was associated with lower risks of heart failure exacerbation and all-cause mortality compared with spironolactone. These observational findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant confirmation in randomized trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Almas et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=982). Finerenone vs. Spironolactone was evaluated on Heart failure exacerbation (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74, p=<0.001). Finerenone use in patients with HFpEF was associated with a lower 1-year risk of heart failure exacerbation compared with spironolactone (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.54-0.74; p<0.001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fe9bc1c9540dea810c7ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcag014
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper