PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Journal of Sports Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Feeding the debate: Do masticatory muscles resist age-related decline better than lower limb muscles?

View Full Paper
GSGustavo Z. SchaunAGAnja GötzMSMichelle Slunecko

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how age affects masticatory and locomotor muscles in women, particularly focusing on muscle size and strength.
  • Cross-sectional comparison of masticatory and locomotor muscles in three age groups: young, middle-aged, and older women.
  • Assessment of muscle cross-sectional area using panoramic ultrasound.
  • Measurement of knee extension torque and bite force using isokinetic dynamometry and a bite force sensor.
  • Both muscle types showed age-related reductions in size and strength.
  • Quadriceps CSA declined to ~75% in middle-aged and 56% in older individuals compared to young adults.
  • Masseter CSA declined to ~94% and 79% for middle-aged and older groups, respectively.
  • Strength reductions were also observed, with greater effect sizes in quadriceps compared to masseter.
  • Masseter strength declined disproportionately to its size compared to quadriceps.

Abstract

Age-related declines in muscle mass and strength result from intrinsic ageing and reduced mechanical loading. Masticatory muscles, being continuously used for feeding, may be less affected. We cross-sectionally compared ageing effects on locomotor and masticatory muscles in 30 women: young (26±1.8 y), middle-aged (44.1±3.4 y), and older (69.5±3.1 y). Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the quadriceps femoris and masseter was assessed by panoramic ultrasound, and knee extension torque (KE) and bite force (BF) were measured via isokinetic dynamometry and a bite force sensor. Both muscles showed progressive age-related reductions. Quadriceps CSA declined to ~75% in middle-aged and 56 ± 13% (older) of young values, while masseter CSA declined to ~94% and 79%, respectively. Strength also declined (KE: ~81% and 62%; BF: ~75% and ~68% of young values; all p<0.05), with no difference between middle-aged and older adults. Effect sizes for CSA were larger in the quadriceps (d = 1.56-2.95) than masseter (d = 0.29-1.09). For strength, effect sizes from young to middle-aged were similar for KE and BF (d = 1.20 vs. 1.33) but greater for KE from young to older adults (d = 2.28 vs. 1.16). Both muscles were smaller and weaker in older groups, but while quadriceps strength roughly mirrored CSA reductions, masseter strength declined disproportionately, suggesting neuromuscular contributions beyond muscle size.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schaun et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fefbc1c9540dea8119a3https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2026.2624232
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Anorexia of Ageing, an Underappreciated Perioperative Concern?2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Sarcopenia, Dynapenia, and the Impact of Advancing Age on Human Skeletal Muscle Size and Strength; a Quantitative Review2012 · 1,382 citations
  3. 3What is the cause of the ageing atrophy?1988 · 2,076 citations
  4. 4G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences2007 · 65,955 citations
  5. 5MUSCLE DISUSE AS A PIVOTAL PROBLEM IN SARCOPENIA-RELATED MUSCLE LOSS AND DYSFUNCTION2016 · 131 citations