PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Surface Review and Letters0 citations

Experimental Evaluation of Surface Roughness During Turning of Sae 1215 Ms Steel on a CNC Lathe using Dry, Flood, and Mql Cooling

View Full Paper
DPDuc-Thanh PhamVPVan-Hung PhamTBTuan-Anh Bui

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the effects of different cooling methods on surface roughness during the turning of SAE 1215 MS steel.
  • Conducted tests on a Tsugami BO12 CNC lathe
  • Employed a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array to vary cutting speed, feed rate, and depth of cut
  • Utilized ANOVA to analyze the impact of cooling methods on surface roughness
  • Feed rate was the primary factor affecting surface roughness, accounting for up to 54.5% of variation
  • Dry cutting produced the best surface finish at high speeds, achieving 0.713 μm
  • MQL was most effective at a moderate speed of 94.20 m/min

Abstract

Surface integrity remains a crucial factor in ensuring the durability and functionality of machined parts, especially in large-scale production settings. This study investigates, through controlled experiments, the effects of three cooling and lubrication methods—dry cutting, flood cooling, and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL)—in combination with key machining variables on average surface roughness (Ra) during the turning of free-machining SAE 1215 MS steel. Tests were conducted on a Tsugami BO12 CNC lathe, employing a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array to systematically vary three levels of cutting speed (V c ), feed rate (f), and depth of cut (t). Statistical analysis used analysis of variance (ANOVA) and signal-to-noise (S/N) ratios to interpret the results. The ANOVA revealed feed rate as the primary factor influencing surface roughness, accounting for 50.4%–54.5% of the total variation, with cutting speed ranking second (20.5%–23.7%) and depth of cut ranking third (13.8%–17.6%). Cross-method comparisons showed that no single cooling technique was universally superior; MQL was most effective at a moderate speed of 94.20 m/min, but dry cutting delivered the best finish at a higher speed of 113.04 m/min—an unexpected benefit. The best surface finish achieved was 0.713 μm, recorded under dry conditions at 113.04 m/min, with a feed of 0.06 mm/rev and a depth of cut of 1.5 mm. This performance results from a significant interaction between V c and t, exclusive to dry machining, in which a greater depth of cut—usually seen as a disadvantage—becomes advantageous at high speeds, highlighting the complex role of process interactions in optimizing surface quality and underscoring the nuanced role of process interactions in optimizing surface quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffb4c1c9540dea8125echttps://doi.org/10.1142/s0218625x26410027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper