PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20261 citationsOpen Access

HPV Exposure in the Gynecological Practice: Time to Call It an Occupational Disease? A Systematic Review of the Literature and ESGO Experts’ Opinion

View Full Paper
HEHasan Volkan EgeBTBilal Esat TemizMGMihaela Grigore

Key Points

  • This research aims to systematically evaluate evidence on occupational HPV transmission risks in healthcare settings.
  • Conducted a systematic review adhering to PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Reviewed 34 studies from electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
  • Included expert opinions from the ESGO Prevention Committee.
  • Literature indicates limited high-quality studies on occupational HPV transmission.
  • Potential risks identified during aerosol or smoke-generating procedures for cervical issues.
  • Detection of HPV DNA found in surgical smoke and on surgical instruments, indicating exposure risks.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection can lead to malignancies of the cervix, vulva, vagina, penis, anus, and oropharynx. The increasing incidence of HPV-related head and neck cancers has raised concerns regarding potential occupational exposure and transmission risks among healthcare workers. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence on occupational HPV transmission in healthcare settings. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science) from inception to August 2025, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A total of 34 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Expert opinions and practical recommendations from members of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) Prevention Committee were included to support interpretation of the results. Results: The available literature on occupational HPV transmission was limited, with a paucity of high-quality studies. Nevertheless, existing data suggest a potential occupational risk, particularly during aerosol or smoke-generating procedures performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cervical cancer. Several studies reported the detection of HPV DNA in surgical smoke or on instruments used during such procedures, indicating possible exposure among healthcare workers. Conclusions: Although current evidence is insufficient to definitively classify HPV infection as an occupational disease, available data indicate a potential exposure risk for healthcare workers involved in HPV-related procedures. Preventive measures, like personal protective equipment, should be emphasized. HPV vaccination has been recommended by some professional societies for healthcare workers performing gynecological procedures, though further research is needed to evaluate vaccine efficacy beyond the standard age range and its cost-effectiveness in this context.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ege et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffb4c1c9540dea8126a4https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14020148
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Occupational HPV Exposure in Otolaryngology: A Scoping Review of Detection, Risk, and Prevention2026
  2. 2Occupational Exposure to Aerosolized Human Papillomavirus: Assessing and Addressing Perceptions of and Barriers to Vaccination of at-Risk Health Care Workers2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Occupational human papillomavirus exposure risks for laryngeal surgeons and phoniatricians: A joint European Laryngological Society (ELS) and Union of European Phoniatricians (UEP) Delphi clinical consensus statement2026
  4. 4Prophylactic HPV Vaccination in Gynaecological Practice: Recommendations, Practices, and Challenges Reported in the ESGO-PERCH HPV Survey2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Occupational HPV exposure and vaccination among healthcare workers: Implications for institutional vaccination strategies2026