PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World0 citationsOpen Access

Redefining Discrimination: Dismantling Environmental Protections through the Logic of Reactionary Color blindness

View Full Paper
ICIan CarrilloAIAnnabel Ipsen

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore the intersection of racism and anti-environmental policies influenced by reactionary colorblindness.
  • Conducted qualitative content analysis of executive orders from the second Trump administration.
  • Focused on identifying themes related to environmental protections and colorblindness in the EOs.
  • Analyzed the language used in the EOs to understand implications for environmental justice.
  • Executive orders justified eliminating environmental justice initiatives by framing them as racial advantages.
  • EOs labeled programs promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion as 'forced discrimination.'
  • The administration adopted an anti-science stance, disregarding environmental and climate science.

Abstract

The authors examine the unique role that racism plays in guiding and structuring anti-environmental ideas and behaviors. They focus on the influence of reactionary colorblindness, which is a legal strategy that promotes race-neutral individuality and activates white resentment in seeking to reverse policies for racial equality. The authors ask, In what ways do anti-environmental policies harness, replicate, and repurpose the logic of reactionary colorblindness? They conduct a qualitative content analysis of a sample of the second Trump administration’s executive orders (EOs). In these EOs, the authors find that the administration draws on reactionary colorblindness as a tool to redefine discrimination and undermine environmental protection in three main ways: (1) the EOs justify eliminating environmental justice initiatives by claiming they confer group-based racial advantages that are antithetical to colorblind individuality; (2) the EOs label diversity, equity, and inclusion, environmental justice, and climate change programs as “forced discrimination” to rationalize policy dismantling; and (3) the EOs adopt a stance of ignorance toward environmental and climate science, thereby rejecting the rationale underlying policies that promote environmental and climate justice. The authors extend debates in environmental sociology and the sociology of race and ethnicity by analyzing how colorblindness and the racism of omission work in service of anti-environmentalism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Carrillo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980ffc6c1c9540dea8128e3https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231251411361
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper