PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Extracting Geometric Parameters of Bridge Cross-Sections from Drawings Using Machine Learning

View Full Paper
BFBenedikt FaltinRARosa AlaniMKMarkus König

Key Points

  • The study aims to automate the extraction of geometric parameters from bridge cross-sections in drawings.
  • Utilized the YOLOv8 network for locating and classifying cross-sections.
  • Employed a segmentation model to generate pixel-wise masks.
  • Applied a global optimization algorithm to fit parametric templates to the generated masks.
  • Evaluated the pipeline on 33 real-world bridge drawings.
  • Achieved a median parameter deviation of -2.2 cm and 2.4 cm.
  • Recorded an average standard deviation of 35.4 cm in extracted parameters.
  • Demonstrated potential for broader application in bridge maintenance.

Abstract

Bridges are a crucial part of infrastructure, but many are in urgent need of maintenance. Digital methods like bim and Digital Twinning can support this process but depend on digital models that are often missing for existing structures. Automating the reconstruction of these models from existing documentation, such as construction drawings, is essential to accelerate digital adoption. Addressing a key step in the reconstruction process, this paper presents an end-to-end pipeline for extracting bridge cross-sections from drawings. First, the YOLOv8 network locates and classifies the cross-sections within the drawing. The results are then processed by the segmentation model sam, which generates pixel-wise masks without requiring task-specific training data. This eliminates the need for manual mask annotation and enables straightforward adaptation to different cross-section types, making the approach broadly applicable in practice. Finally, a global optimization algorithm fits parametric templates to the masks, minimizing a custom loss function to extract geometric parameters. The pipeline is evaluated on 33 real-world drawings and achieves a median parameter deviation of −2.2 cm and 2.4 cm, with an average standard deviation of 35.4 cm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Faltin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fff5c1c9540dea812e94https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures11020048
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper