PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Design Thinking as a Strategic and Cognitive Framework for Innovation and Entrepreneurship

View Full Paper
MVMiguel Virgen

Key Points

  • The paper examines design thinking as a cognitive and organizational framework for innovation and entrepreneurship.
  • Analysis of design thinking's evolution in business strategy and education.
  • Evaluation of its application across various sectors like corporations and universities.
  • Discussion on the implications of biases and systemic inequities in the design process.
  • Design thinking integrates creativity with analytical rigor to address complex problems.
  • Human-centered design approaches improve employability through enhanced observation skills in students.
  • The framework identifies social consequences as a key outcome in knowledge creation.

Abstract

Over the past two decades, Design Thinking has moved from the margins of design practice into the core of business strategy, entrepreneurship, and innovation research. Initially associated with industrial design and creative problem-solving, the framework has been widely adopted by corporations, startups, public institutions, and universities as a structured approach to addressing complex, ill-defined problems. Its appeal lies in its promise to integrate creativity with analytical rigor while keeping human needs at the center of organizational decision-making. Human-centered design approaches, such as design thinking, target user needs but lack built-in mechanisms to systematically address biases. Since design thinking is a human centered approach to problem-solving that integrates a mindset, process, and toolbox to drive innovation it can be take extensive human skill. It inspires creative solutions to complex problems by balancing user needs, technological possibilities, and business requirements (Scharff, et al., 2025). However, while design thinking prioritizes human needs, it does not inherently cover how to deal with biases. It also does not address how power, systemic inequities, and designer biases influence the design process and outcomes (Scharff, et al., 2025). Education leaders have highlighted the significance of incorporating design thinking in graduate level programs, which will inculcate student observation and inquiry skills and make them more employable (Das, et al., 2024). The design thinking approach involves an iterative process of generating ideas, testing them, and refining them based on feedback. This approach can be used to tailor education programs to enhance career self-efficacy. Design Thinking is argued to be a better approach for practical applications and identifies social consequences as the primary outcome of knowledge creation (Das, et al., 2024). This paper provides an examination of the Design Thinking framework, situating it within broader theoretical debates in management, entrepreneurship, and innovation studies. It argues that Design Thinking is best understood not merely as a set of tools, but as a cognitive and organizational logic that reshapes how firms identify opportunities, generate solutions, and adapt to uncertainty.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Miguel Virgen (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fff5c1c9540dea812f3ehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18446379
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper