PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 10, 2011New England Journal of Medicine9,472 citationsOpen Access

Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

View Full Paper
MPManesh R. PatelKMKenneth W. MahaffeyJGJyotsna Garg

Key Result

Rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96).

Key Points

  • To compare the effectiveness of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in preventing stroke or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation.
  • Randomized trial
  • Participants had nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
  • ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00403767
  • Rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention (p<0.05)
  • No significant difference in the overall risk of major bleeding between groups
  • Intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=14,264)

Blinding

Double-blind

Randomization

Central computerized randomization

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does rivaroxaban prevent stroke or systemic embolism compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?

P
Population
Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation
I
Intervention
Rivaroxaban
C
Comparator
Warfarin
O
Outcome
Stroke or systemic embolismhard clinical

Rivaroxaban is a noninferior alternative to warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, offering a lower risk of intracranial and fatal bleeding.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.96)

Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs 2.2%

p-value: p=<0.001

Limitations

  • The study included a high proportion of patients with prior stroke or other risk factors, which may affect generalizability.

Abstract

In patients with atrial fibrillation, rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism. There was no significant between-group difference in the risk of major bleeding, although intracranial and fatal bleeding occurred less frequently in the rivaroxaban group. (Funded by Johnson ROCKET AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00403767.).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2011) conducted an RCT in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (n=14,264). Rivaroxaban vs. Warfarin (dose-adjusted) was evaluated on Composite of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) and systemic embolism (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66-0.96, p=<0.001). Rivaroxaban was noninferior to warfarin for the prevention of stroke or systemic embolism, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.66 to 0.96).

synapsesocial.com/papers/69813150ce4d1f8e18d4e860https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1009638
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper