PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Cancer Cell International0 citationsOpen Access

Personalized chemotherapy guided by drug sensitivity of circulating tumor cells improves outcomes in advanced biliary tract cancer

View Full Paper
HLHuafei LiSCShuangqun ChenXKXiaoxia Kou

Key Points

  • To assess the efficacy of CTC-based drug-sensitivity-guided chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of 85 advanced BTC patients
  • Comparison of CTC-based drug-sensitivity-guided chemotherapy, FOLFOX, and empirical therapy
  • Enriched CTCs tested for drug sensitivity using a glucose uptake assay
  • Evaluation of therapeutic efficacy, including patient response, PFS, OS, and toxicity profiles
  • Objective response rate was 16% in CSBT, 6.7% in FOLFOX, and 4.4% in empirical therapy
  • Disease control rate was 56% in CSBT compared to 20% in FOLFOX and 22.2% in empirical therapy (p < 0.05)
  • Median PFS was 5.4 months for CSBT vs. 1.9 months for FOLFOX and 2.7 months for empirical (p < 0.05)
  • Median OS was 12 months for CSBT compared to 5.1 months for FOLFOX and 7.8 months for empirical therapy (p < 0.05)

Abstract

Biliary tract carcinoma (BTC) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis, and chemotherapy's effectiveness is limited, especially after first-line therapy failure. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) offer a promising platform for in vitro drug-sensitivity testing to optimize subsequent-line chemotherapy, but the clinical efficacy and prognostic value remain underexplored. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 85 advanced BTC patients, with 25 receiving CTC-based drug-sensitivity-guided chemotherapy (CSBT), 15 receiving FOLFOX based chemotherapy, and 45 receiving empirical therapy. CTCs were enriched and tested for drug sensitivity using a glucose uptake assay. Therapeutic efficacy, including patient response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profiles, was evaluated. The results indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) was 16% in CSBT, 6.7% in FOLFOX, and 4.4% in the empirical group. The disease control rate (DCR) was significantly higher in CSBT group (56%) compared to the FOLFOX (20%) and empirical therapy (22.2%; p < 0.05) groups. Median PFS (mPFS) was significantly prolonged in the CSBT group (5.4 months) versus the FOLFOX (1.9 months) and empirical therapy (2.7 months; p < 0.05) groups. Median OS (mOS) was extended in the CSBT group (12 months) compared with the FOLFOX (5.1 months) and EBT group (7.8 months), with a significant improvement during the first year of treatment (p < 0.05). Toxicity profiles were similar across all groups. This study demonstrates, for the first time, that CTC-based drug sensitivity testing offers a potential strategy to guide subsequent anti-cancer therapy for advanced BTC, providing a safe and effective approach to improving patient prognosis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843371f1d9ada3c1fb09e7https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-026-04198-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper