PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Environmental and Engineering Geoscience0 citations

Application of Machine Learning to Predict Groundwater Levels in Southeast Florida

View Full Paper
MRMartina RogersMSMichael C. SukopJOJayantha Obeysekera

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess the effectiveness of machine learning techniques in predicting groundwater levels in Southeast Florida.
  • Utilized extreme gradient boosting as a machine learning technique.
  • Compared the performance of the extreme gradient boosting model with a traditional numerical model.
  • Measured accuracy using root mean square error.
  • Identified problematic areas where both models performed poorly.
  • The extreme gradient boosting model provided better accuracy compared to the numerical model at most monitoring sites.
  • Model comparison uncovered factors leading to poor performance in certain areas.
  • The importance of each feature affecting groundwater levels was ranked, including lag times.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Miami-Dade County, FL, has complex hydrological and water management conditions, creating challenges for predicting groundwater levels. Due to the potential impacts of increasing sea level and changes in rain patterns on flooding and saltwater intrusion, it is essential to be able to accurately predict groundwater levels and to understand the drivers of groundwater levels. The method traditionally used to predict groundwater levels in south Florida and elsewhere is through the implementation of a numerical model. This research looks at machine learning techniques as an alternative method to provide improved predictions of groundwater levels. Extreme gradient boosting is one of the machine learning techniques that uses algorithms to train a model by identifying hidden patterns and relationships between groundwater level drivers and groundwater levels. The accuracies of the extreme gradient boosting model and a numerical model were compared by computing the root mean square error as a model performance measure. Comparing these two methods showed that the extreme gradient boosting model had better accuracy in predicting groundwater levels at the majority of groundwater monitoring sites. Furthermore, comparison of these two models helped us to identify problematic areas where both models performed poorly and narrow down the factors that could cause this poor model performance. Finally, the extreme gradient boosting method gave the importance of each feature included among the potential groundwater level drivers, including the ranked importance of a particular factor and its lag time, at each of the considered groundwater level monitoring sites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rogers et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69843371f1d9ada3c1fb0a2dhttps://doi.org/10.21663/eeg-d-25-00016
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper