PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Sustainability8 citationsOpen Access

Knowledge Territories: Conclusions from a Systematic Literature Review

View Full Paper
DADenis dos Santos AlvesMSMilena Pavan SerafimMNM. Noronha

Key Points

  • The aim is to consolidate literature on knowledge territories to enhance theoretical frameworks and policy-making.
  • Conducted a systematic review with bibliometric and content analysis
  • Examined publications related to eight denominations of knowledge territories
  • Analyzed 214 texts across 11 core journals
  • Identified 114 case studies with governance as the most common dimension (53% of texts)
  • Noted that themes like climate change and food production are underexplored
  • Highlighted the dispersal of authorship with 339 single-article authors and a core of 13 multi-article authors

Abstract

In recent decades, governments have invested in strategic territories focused on knowledge production and application, which are strategic for socioeconomic development, particularly in urban areas. However, conceptual and terminological diversity hinders aspects such as the systematization of the literature, the advance of theoretical conceptualizations, and the formulation of coherent policies, especially in the context of socioenvironmental challenges. In this study, with the aim of consolidating this literature, we have conducted a systematic review with bibliometric and content analysis, examining publications on eight denominations associated with these territories. The literature reveals the existence of an established field; nonetheless, themes and denominations are still dispersed in the corpus. Among 400 authors, 339 published a single article, and only 13 authors have three or more studies in the sample. We identified a core of 11 journals that concentrate 73 of the 214 analyzed texts. We propose the term “knowledge territories” as an umbrella concept. A total of 114 case studies were identified. Governance is the most recurrent dimension (53% of the texts). Topics such as climate change, food production and diffuse effects of territorial occupation are rarely explored, as are the cases analyzed in the context of semi-peripheral and peripheral countries, indicating gaps and opportunities for future research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alves et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984343ff1d9ada3c1fb21f7https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031504
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper