PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026PLoS ONE0 citationsOpen Access

Intratumoral spatial heterogeneity at non-contrast CT predicts histological grading of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study

View Full Paper
SQShize QinSZSijia ZhouYLYongying Liu

Key Points

  • This study aims to develop a CT-based model that can predict the histological grading of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma by analyzing intratumoral spatial heterogeneity.
  • Retrospective study involving 355 invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients.
  • Tumors graded using the IASLC grading system and divided into training/validation and test cohorts.
  • Intratumoral subregions created through unsupervised clustering of CT images.
  • Spatial interaction quantified using a Multi-regional Spatial Interaction (MSI) matrix.
  • Five predictive models were developed and assessed using ROC curves.
  • Three distinct subregions identified within tumors.
  • High-grade tumors showed different proportions of subregions compared to low-grade tumors.
  • The MSI model achieved an AUC of 0.806 in the test cohort, outperforming other models.
  • SHAP analysis highlighted the relative border proportion between subregions as a key indicator for high-grade tumors.

Abstract

Objectives The International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) grading system is key to the prognosis and treatment of Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma (IPA). However, current radiomics and other radiological approaches poorly capture tumor heterogeneity, limiting predictive power. This study aimed to develop an interpretable CT-based model that predicts the histological grading of IPA by decoding its intratumoral spatial heterogeneity. Materials and methods This multi‑center retrospective study enrolled 355 IPA patients, split into training/validation (7: 3) and an independent test cohort. Tumors were graded as low‑grade (Ⅰ/Ⅱ) or high‑grade (Ⅲ) per IASLC criteria. Intratumoral subregions were generated via unsupervised clustering of CT images, and their spatial interaction heterogeneity was quantified using a Multi-regional Spatial Interaction (MSI) matrix. Five models (clinical‑radiological, radiomics, MSI, radiomics‑combined, MSI‑combined) were built using four preprocessors and five classifiers. The optimal model was selected based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve in the validation cohort, with generalizability assessed in the test cohort. Performance was compared via the DeLong test, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis interpreted feature contributions. Results Three subregions were generated. The high-grade group exhibited a larger proportion of Subregion 1, while showing a smaller proportion of Subregion 2. The MSI model based on 10 MSI features achieved an AUC of 0. 806 in the test cohort, outperforming clinical‑radiological, radiomics, and radiomics‑combined models (p = 0. 002, 0. 010, 0. 022). Adding clinical‑radiological features did not improve the MSI model (p = 0. 083). SHAP identified MSIborderₚroportion₂₃ (relative border proportion between Subregions 2 and 3) as the most influential feature, with lower values indicating high‑grade IPA. Conclusion The CT-based MSI model can predict the histological grade of IPA by decoding the spatial interaction heterogeneity of different subregions in the tumor, thereby providing reliable imaging evidence for preoperative individualized risk assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6984349af1d9ada3c1fb2debhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341163
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper