PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 2026Sustainability0 citationsOpen Access

The Impact of National Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks on Rural Residents’ Income: Evidence from China

View Full Paper
XLXiaoling LiWHWeiting HuangJLJilong Liu

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how National Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks affect rural residents' income in China and the factors involved.
  • Utilized county- and household-level panel data from 2014 to 2022.
  • Applied a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) design with two-way fixed effects.
  • Conducted an event-study analysis for comprehensive evaluation.
  • Establishment of NMAIPs raises rural residents' income by approximately 1.83% on average.
  • Income gains largely stem from employment expansion, technological upgrading, and capital agglomeration.
  • NMAIPs notably increase wage and operating income while minimally affecting property and transfer income.
  • NMAIPs help reduce intra-rural inequality and moderate the urban-rural income gap.

Abstract

Agricultural industrial parks have been promoted as a key instrument for agricultural modernization, yet causal evidence of their impact on raising rural residents’ income remains limited. This study evaluates the income effects of National Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks (NMAIPs) in China, clarifying the transmission mechanisms and distributional consequences for rural households and the urban–rural income gap. Using county- and household-level panel data (2014–2022), we exploit the staggered rollout of NMAIPs as a quasi-natural experiment and employ a staggered Difference-in-Differences (DID) design with two-way fixed effects, complemented by event-study analysis. Results show that NMAIP establishment raises rural residents’ income by approximately 1.83% on average. Mechanism analysis indicates that this gain operates primarily through employment expansion, technological upgrading, and capital agglomeration. At the household level, NMAIPs significantly increase wage and operating income but have limited effects on property and transfer income, reflecting constraints in rural asset markets. Furthermore, NMAIPs reduce intra-rural inequality and moderate the urban–rural income gap following an inverted U-shaped path (initial widening followed by narrowing), as benefits diffuse through value chains. We conclude that NMAIPs are an effective policy lever for inclusive rural growth, yet their distributive outcomes could be enhanced by supporting reforms in rural factor markets and public service delivery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434a6f1d9ada3c1fb30bbhttps://doi.org/10.3390/su18031499
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Impact of National-Level Modern Agricultural Industrial Parks on County Economies: The Analysis of Lag Effects and Impact Pathways2025 · 5 citations
  2. 2How Rural Industrial Integration Affects Sustainable Farmers’ Income Growth and Agricultural Modernization in China2026
  3. 3Does high-value agriculture exacerbate rural household income inequality? Evidence from China’s national advantageous agricultural product zones policy2026 · 2 citations
  4. 4The Impact of Agricultural New-Quality Productive Forces on Farmers’ Income Structure Under the Promotion of Common Prosperity: Evidence from Panel Data of 30 Chinese Provinces2026
  5. 5A study on the impact of rural industrial integration on food production: empirical evidence from 2,571 counties in China2025 · 5 citations