PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 5, 20260 citations

Research on Performance Evaluation of Integrated Energy System Based on Carbon Footprint Analysis and Scorecard Modeling

View Full Paper
MYMingzhu YanJWJihui WuJLJiachun Li

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a comprehensive performance evaluation model for integrated energy systems based on carbon footprint analysis.
  • Introduced structural models and characteristics of integrated energy system scenarios.
  • Analyzed carbon emissions of the system during its life cycle using carbon footprint perspective.
  • Established a multidimensional evaluation index system using the Pressure-State-Response model.
  • Combined AHP method, CRITIC method, and scorecard model to determine system performance.
  • Selected a construction project in Xinjiang as a case study.
  • Established a comprehensive evaluation system integrating environmental, energy, reliability, economic, and social aspects.
  • Demonstrated the effectiveness of combining subjective and objective weighting methods for performance scoring.
  • Identified areas for improvement in the existing energy system evaluation methods.

Abstract

This study introduces the structural models and operational characteristics of several typical integrated energy system scenarios, and analyzes the mathematical models and working principles of the main equipment in the New Energy-Combined Cooling Heating and Power (NE-CCHP) system. Combined with the characteristics of the integrated energy system and the deficiencies of the existing energy system evaluation system, the direct and indirect carbon emissions of the integrated energy system during its life cycle are analyzed from the perspective of the carbon footprint, and a set of multidimensional evaluation index system dominated by the carbon footprint is established through the “Pressure-State-Response” model. The evaluation system combines the environmental, energy, reliability, economic and social aspects of the system to evaluate the performance of the integrated energy system. The hierarchical analysis method (AHP), CRITIC method and scorecard model were combined. The AHP method and CRITIC method were used to calculate the subjective and objective weight values respectively, and then the dynamic combination weight method was used to calculate the combination weights, and then the comprehensive score of the system was calculated based on the scorecard model. A construction project in a region of Xinjiang was selected as the research object for the study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698434ebf1d9ada3c1fb3a96https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202563401001/pdf
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A low-carbon evaluation framework for regional power systems2024 · 4 citations
  2. 2Construction and Case Analysis of a Comprehensive Evaluation System for Rural Building Energy Consumption from an Energy–Building–Behavior Composite Perspective2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Construction and Case Analysis of Comprehensive Evaluation System of Rural Building Energy Consumption from Energy-Building-Behavior Composite Perspective2024 · 5 citations
  4. 4Research on Portfolio Strategies for Low-Carbon Transition Pathways in Electricity-Heat Nexus Systems Incorporating Multi-Device Integrated Systems2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Integrated energy system evaluation and optimization based on integrated evaluation model and time-series optimization2024