PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citations

Invasion preferences suggest a possible role for Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the expansion of Duffy negativity in West and Central Africa.

View Full Paper
BMBalanding MannehUniversity of CambridgeVIViola IntroiniUniversity of CambridgeJRJames Reed

Key Points

  • To determine if Plasmodium falciparum shows a preference for invading specific Duffy RBC phenotypes.
  • Used flow cytometry and microscopy to assess invasion preferences.
  • Analyzed biophysical properties and surface protein composition of RBCs.
  • Developed an evolutionary-epidemiological model incorporating invasion data and immunity.
  • Plasmodium falciparum preferred invading Duffy-positive RBCs.
  • Biophysical and protein expression differences were noted between Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative RBCs.
  • Inhibition of P. falciparum led to increasing FYBES frequencies at low transmission but decreasing at high transmission levels.

Abstract

Duffy antigen receptor for chemokines (DARC) is the primary red blood cell (RBC) receptor for invasion of human RBCs by Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium knowlesi parasites. By contrast, Plasmodium falciparum parasites use multiple RBC receptors for invasion. Whether DARC is one of these receptors has never been systematically explored. We used flow cytometry and microscopy-based approaches to investigate whether P. falciparum parasites preferentially invade specific Duffy RBC phenotypes and explored two potential explanations for invasion preference - differences in RBC biophysical properties and surface protein composition. P. falciparum parasites showed a consistent preference for Duffy-positive RBCs, and some biophysical properties and surface protein expression varied between Duffy-positive and Duffy-negative RBCs. We then used our in vitro invasion data to parametrise an evolutionary-epidemiological model of the relationship between P. falciparum and the FYBES allele. Our model accounts for immunity against P. falciparum virulence, gained through exposure, and thus mutations that impede infection are not always advantageous. The inhibition of P. falciparum invasion that we observed in vitro leads to FYBES frequencies increasing at low levels of P. falciparum transmission but decreasing at high levels of transmission. The impact of P. falciparum on the prevalence of Duffy negativity may therefore be most apparent in lower transmission settings. Our findings are the first to show a link between Duffy negativity and P. falciparum and suggest that DARC may directly or indirectly be involved in P. falciparum invasion of human RBCs which could, together with P. vivax, explain the distribution of Duffy negativity in sub-Saharan Africa.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Manneh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585bd8f7c464f23009648https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msag033
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Invasion preferences suggest a possible role for Plasmodium falciparum parasites in the expansion of Duffy negativity in West and Central Africa2026
  2. 2Post-admixture selection favours Duffy negativity in the Lower Okavango Basin2025
  3. 3Highly conserved Plasmodium vivax genomes in Duffy-negative individuals from Sudan2025
  4. 4High prevalence of mixed Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax co-infections in Duffy negative individuals in Ethiopia2025
  5. 5Genetic variation in the Duffy blood group among vivax malaria patients and its impact on disease susceptibility2026