PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Beyond Spacetime: Interpretive Remarks on Matter, Interaction, and Invariance within Temporal Rate Ontology

View Full Paper
GKGeorgios K. Kouvidis

Key Points

  • The aim is to clarify how matter, interactions, and invariant quantities can be understood beyond spacetime geometry.
  • Analyzed the implications of Temporal Rate Ontology on matter and interaction.
  • Examined the role of fundamental constants like the speed of light.
  • Presented an interpretive reframing rather than proposing new physical dynamics.
  • Proposes matter as a stable pattern of temporal succession.
  • Defines interactions as constraints among patterns of coordinated succession.
  • Considers the speed of light as a limit on temporal coordination rather than a spatial property.

Abstract

Temporal Rate Ontology (TRO) advances the claim that ordered temporal succession is ontologically primitive, while spacetime geometry functions as a representational structure rather than a fundamental constituent of reality. Existing work within the framework has focused primarily on spacetime ontology and the interpretive status of geometry. The present paper extends this analysis in a deliberately limited and programmatic manner to three further domains: matter, interaction, and fundamental constants such as the speed of light. No new physical dynamics are proposed, and no derivation of particle physics, gauge structure, or conservation laws is attempted. Instead, the paper offers an interpretive reframing of how matter, forces, and invariant quantities may be understood once geometric fundamentality is resisted. Matter is provisionally interpreted as a dynamically stable pattern of coordinated temporal succession; interactions as representational encodings of coordination constraints among such patterns; and the speed of light as a bound on temporal coordination rather than a property of space or a physical medium. The aim is not explanatory replacement but conceptual clarification, and the limits of the proposal are explicitly delineated.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Georgios K. Kouvidis (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585cb8f7c464f23009663https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18480517
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper