PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026Energy Science & Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Emissions Reductions and Economic Feasibility of China's Solar Thermal Power Industry After the Introduction of Chinese Certified Emission Reduction Policy

View Full Paper
YLYun LiXLXi LiuYHYaxuan Han

Key Points

  • The study examines the emissions reductions and economic implications of China's solar thermal power industry following a revised policy.
  • Analyzed CO2 and air pollutant emissions reductions
  • Conducted comprehensive cost-benefit analysis
  • Evaluated economic feasibility through 2025
  • Assessed spatial distribution of emissions reductions
  • STP emissions reductions and CCER revenue benefits are projected to increase
  • Economic feasibility of the STP industry declines by 2025 due to subsidy cancellations
  • NOx is the most reduced air pollutant, while PM reductions are minimal
  • Recommendations for policy adjustments to support the STP industry

Abstract

ABSTRACT To promote the development of renewable energy, China re‐implemented the Chinese Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) policy in 2023. This study explores certificated CO 2 and air pollutants (i.e., NO x , SO 2 and particulate matter (PM)) emissions reductions from China's solar thermal power (STP) industry at national scale and conducts the comprehensive cost‐benefit analysis with consideration of CCER policy. We find that: (1) generally, STP‐related emissions reductions and associated benefits from CCER revenue have followed and will continue to present an upward tendency; however, the STP industry would turn to be not economic feasible in 2025, due to the renewable energy subsidies cancellation. (2) From a spatial perspective, STP‐related emissions reductions are highly concentrated in the northwest region. (3) Among species, NO x makes the largest contribution to STP‐related air pollutants emissions reductions and the associated co‐benefits, while PM makes the least. (4) As for policy implication, CCER policy should be carefully designed and dynamically adjusted together with other additional policies, and thus further facilitates the development of the STP industry.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698585cb8f7c464f230097dbhttps://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70464
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Co-Benefits of Solar PV Expansion and CCUS Deployment for Carbon and Air-Pollutant Reduction in Guangxi’s Power System: A LEAP-Based Scenario Analysis to 20602026
  2. 2Seasonal thermal energy storage employing solar heat: A case study of Heilongjiang, China, exploring the transition to clean heating and renewable power integration2024 · 5 citations
  3. 3Strategic Deployment of CCUS in China: Aiming for Carbon Neutrality in Key Industries2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4The spillover effects of China’s carbon trading policy on coordinated emission efficiency2024 · 5 citations
  5. 5Pricing of Chinese Certified Emissions Reduction Scheme in a Supply Chain Under the Cap-and-Trade Policy2024 · 2 citations