PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Mechanical Conditioning (MeCo) Score Progressively Increases Through the Metastatic Cascade in Breast Cancer via Circulating Tumor Cells

View Full Paper
GMGhassan MouneimneCCCasey ConnorsAWAdam Watson

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess how mechanical conditioning scores change in breast cancer as it progresses from primary tumors to circulating tumor cells and eventual metastasis.
  • Isolated circulating tumor cells from patients with early- and late-stage breast cancer.
  • Used RNA-seq for gene expression profiling of CTCs and matched primary tumors or metastases.
  • Applied quantile normalization for cross-cohort comparisons of MeCo scores.
  • Employed Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank and Mann-Whitney unpaired tests for statistical analysis.
  • Increased MeCo scores in CTCs compared to matched primary tumors in early-stage patients (p=0.026).
  • Higher MeCo scores in metastatic tissues compared to matched CTCs in late-stage patients (p=0.0004).
  • Similar MeCo scores in CTCs across early- and late-stage cohorts despite different isolation methods.
  • 98% of genes in the MeCo score were present across all evaluated samples.

Abstract

Background: The mechanical conditioning (MeCo) score is a multigene expression signature that is acquired by cancer cells in the primary breast tumor and is reflective of their responsiveness to ECM stiffness caused by tumor fibrosis. Chromatin remodeling downstream of mechanotransduction allows cancer cells to retain these acquired aggressive features even in the absence of mechanical stimulation from the primary tumor microenvironment, for instance, after dissemination through systemic circulation during metastasis. Importantly, patients who have high MeCo score tumors are at higher risk of developing metastatic breast cancer, compared to those with low MeCo scores. Moreover, circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are associated with a higher rate of metastatic dissemination, making CTC detection in the circulation of patients with breast cancer a significant prognostic biomarker for breast cancer metastasis. Beyond their enumeration per blood volume units, specific prognostic features of CTCs are not fully explored. We sought to determine whether MeCo scores increase stepwise along the metastatic cascade, from primary tumors to CTCs to distant metastatic colonization, using patient-matched biopsies. Methods: CTCs were isolated from the peripheral blood of two patient cohorts: patients with early-stage breast cancer using immunomagnetic enrichment/FACS methodology; and patients with late-stage breast cancer using the ANGLE Parsortix microfluidics system. Gene expression profiling using RNA-seq was performed on CTCs and matched primary tumors (PTs) in the early-stage cohort, and on CTCs and matched metastases (METs) for the late-stage cohorts. A quantile normalization approach was used to allow comparison across cohorts and MeCo scores were computed for all samples. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was performed for the comparison of MeCo scores from matching samples within each cohort; the Mann-Whitney unpaired test was used to compare MeCo scores of CTCs across cohorts. Results: In 12 pairs of patients with early-stage breast cancer, MeCo scores in CTCs were significantly higher than in their matched PTs ( = 0.026). Additionally, in 26 pairs of metastatic patient CTCs and METs, MeCo scores were significantly higher in METs compared to matched CTCs ( = 0.0004). MeCo scores of CTCs were similar between patients with early- and late-stage breast cancers, despite differing CTC isolation strategies (epitope-dependent and microfluidics size gradient). Notably, 98% of the genes in the MeCo score were present across evaluable CTC, MET, and PT samples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mouneimne et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586238f7c464f2300a1e1https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284566
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper