PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 6, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

The usefulness of automatic office blood pressure measurement in comparison with 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hemodialyzed patients - preliminary results.

View Full Paper
MZM Z D Maria Zaborska-DworakMedical University of WarsawWKW K Wojciech KrasowskiMedical University of WarsawBSB S Bartosz SymonidesMedical University of Warsaw

Key Result

Automated office blood pressure monitoring performed before or after dialysis showed no significant difference in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to 44-hour ambulatory monitoring.

Key Points

  • To compare the measurement accuracy of automatic office blood pressure (AOBP) and 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
  • Examined 41 hemodialysis patients on stable dialysis prescriptions.
  • Performed AOBP measurements both postdialysis and predialysis.
  • Patients wore an ABPM monitor for 44 hours to capture blood pressure data.
  • No significant difference in AOBP readings post and pre-dialysis measurements.
  • Mean systolic blood pressure was consistent pre and post dialysis around 138.8 mmHg and 137 mmHg.
  • Mean diastolic blood pressure was similar, averaging approximately 79 mmHg for both measurements.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=41)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does automated office blood pressure monitoring (AOBPM) approximate 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) values in hemodialysis patients?

P
Population
41 hemodialysis patients (mean age 64.6 years, 46.3% female) on stable hemodialysis prescription undergoing mid-week dialysis.
E
Exposure
Automated office blood pressure monitoring (AOBPM) performed postdialytic and predialytic
C
Comparator
44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)
O
Outcome
Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure valuessurrogate

Automated office blood pressure monitoring before or after dialysis provides comparable mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure values to the 44-hour ambulatory monitoring gold standard, offering a more accessible method for BP control in hemodialysis patients.

Abstract

Abstract Background Arterial hypertension occurs in nearly 82-89% of patients who undergo hemodialysis (HD) due to renal failure. In this group, hypertension is satisfactorily controlled in only 30% of patients. The lack of satisfactory blood pressure control is associated with very high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) remains a gold standard in this group, in the recent years automated office blood pressure monitoring (AOBP) has been proposed to increase the accuracy of office blood pressure (OBP) readings. Purpose This study aimed to compare 44-hour ABPM with postdialytic and predialytic AOBPM in HD patients on stable hemodialysis prescription. Methods We examined 41 patients (mean age 64.61± 13.78, 53.7% male, 51.2% permcath), who were undergoing a middle of a week dialyses in our HD-center. In each patient AOBPM measurement was be performed after dialysis and then for 44 hours (interdialysis) an ABPM monitor was worn. After the ABPM was completed, the pressure was measured again by the AOBPM method. Results We found no significant statistical difference in AOBPM measurement values post and pre dialyses. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) post dialyses was 138,8± 26 mmHg vs pre dialyses SBP 137 ± 22 mmHg, p=. Mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) post dialyses was 78.96 ± 11.67 mmHg vs 78.28± 10.99 mmHg. Moreover, we found no significant statistical difference in AOBPM measurement values post and pre dialyses in comparison with ABPM mean SBP and mean DBP. Conclusions Performing AOBPM before or after dialysis can approximate mean SBP and DBP values from 44-hour ABPM. Therefore, use ABOMP could increase the availability of effective and reliable method of blood pressure measurement, reduce time of examination and improve blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zaborska-Dworak et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Arterial hypertension in hemodialysis patients (n=41). Automated office blood pressure monitoring (AOBPM) vs. 44-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was evaluated on Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Automated office blood pressure monitoring performed before or after dialysis showed no significant difference in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to 44-hour ambulatory monitoring.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698586ad8f7c464f2300a659https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3377
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper