PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Nature Catalysis15 citations

Regulating in situ gaseous deposition to construct highly durable Fe–N–C oxygen-reduction fuel cell catalysts

View Full Paper
YZYachao ZengMQManman QiJLJiashun Liang

Key Points

  • To enhance the durability of Fe–N–C catalysts while maintaining their oxygen reduction reaction performance.
  • Developed an in situ chemical vapour deposition approach during catalyst synthesis.
  • Conducted rotating disk electrode tests to assess catalyst performance.
  • Evaluated catalysts in membrane electrode assemblies under H2–air conditions.
  • The optimal catalyst exhibits a half-wave potential of 0.867 V with no change after 100,000 cycles.
  • Delivered 93 mA cm−2 at 0.8 V after 30,000 voltage cycles with minimal current density losses.
  • Achieved durability increases through strengthened Fe–N bonds and increased active-site density.

Abstract

The activity–stability trade-off challenges the design of high-performance atomically dispersed iron–nitrogen–carbon (Fe–N–C) catalysts for the acidic oxygen reduction reaction in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Here we develop an in situ chemical vapour deposition approach during catalyst synthesis to break the trade-off, producing highly stable Fe–N–C catalysts while maintaining adequate oxygen reduction reaction activity. The optimal catalyst exhibits a half-wave potential of 0.867 V, remaining unchanged after an accelerated stress test (AST) of 100,000 potential cycles in rotating disk electrode tests. In membrane electrode assemblies under H 2 –air conditions, it delivers 93 mA cm −2 at 0.8 V after a standard AST of 30,000 voltage cycles, and shows minimal current density losses (2.9% at 0.6 V; 14.2% at 0.7 V) after an extended AST up to 120,000 cycles. The catalyst’s durability improvement is primarily due to the in situ chemical vapour deposition, which strengthens Fe–N bonds, increases active-site density, mitigates iron aggregates and reduces surface porosity.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6987eb5df6bacdd2fe8fc972https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-026-01482-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Interpretable design of Ir-free trimetallic electrocatalysts for ammonia oxidation with graph neural networks2023 · 138 citations
  2. 2Advanced impedance study of polymer electrolyte membrane single cells by means of distribution of relaxation times2018 · 243 citations
  3. 3Roles of copper(I) in water-promoted CO2 electrolysis to multi-carbon compounds2024 · 95 citations
  4. 4PGM-Free Oxygen-Reduction Catalyst Development for Proton-Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells: Challenges, Solutions, and Promises2022 · 152 citations
  5. 5Regulating Catalytic Properties and Thermal Stability of Pt and PtCo Intermetallic Fuel-Cell Catalysts via Strong Coupling Effects between Single-Metal Site-Rich Carbon and Pt2023 · 269 citations