PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Frontiers in Psychiatry1 citationsOpen Access

Psychometric network analysis of depression in hypertensive older adults: identifying core symptoms and modifiable risk factors

YLYong LiFCFengdan ChenLMLanxian Mai

Key Points

  • This research constructs a network of depression symptoms among elderly hypertensive patients and identifies central symptoms and modifiable risk factors.
  • Retrospective study design reviewing medical and survey records from 562 elderly hypertensive patients.
  • Utilized demographic questionnaires, Insomnia Severity Index-7, PHQ-9, GAD-7, and Connor Davidson Resilience Scale-25 for data collection.
  • Calculated centrality indices to identify core depression symptoms across healthcare records.
  • Anhedonia was found to be the most central symptom in the depression network.
  • Significant correlations were observed between sleep problems, fatigue, and mood symptoms.
  • Psychological resilience negatively correlates with depression scores, suggesting it may protect against severe symptoms.

Abstract

Objectives This study aims to construct a depression symptom network in elderly hypertensive patients, identify central and bridging symptoms, and explore the association between network structure and modifiable risk factors. Methods This study adopts a retrospective research design, reviewing the medical records and survey data of 562 elderly hypertensive patients from a tertiary comprehensive hospital from September 2022 to May 2023. The data was retrospectively collected from patient health records including a general demographic questionnaire, Insomnia Severity Index-7(ISI-7), 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Connor Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CD-RISC-25). Calculate centrality indices (intensity, betweenness centrality, and intimacy) to identify core symptoms. A comprehensive network model integrating GAD-7, ISI-7, CD-RISC-25, and demographic variables was constructed. Results A total of 562 patients were enrolled in the study. The average score of PHQ-9 is (10.69 ± 3.42) points. Network analysis shows that anhedonia (PHQ1) exhibits the highest intensity centrality. The strongest partial correlation was observed between Sleep problems(PHQ3) and PHQ1 (weight=0.40), fatigue (PHQ4) and depressed mood (PHQ2) (weight=0.29), and PHQ4 and PHQ1 (weight=0.29). There are two different symptom clusters: somatic affective clusters (PHQ1, PHQ3, PHQ4) and cognitive vegetative clusters (appetite problems(PHQ5), feeling of worthlessness (PHQ6), concentration problems (PHQ7)). Suicide ideation (PHQ9) exhibits the lowest centrality. The comprehensive network model indicates a strong positive correlation between depression and anxiety (PHQ-GAD), depression and insomnia (PHQ-ISI), and anxiety and insomnia (GAD-ISI). The dimensions of psychological resilience, including self reinforcement, resilience, and optimism, are negatively correlated with PHQ scores (all P0.001), while GAD-7 scores are positively correlated. There are edge connections between exercise (EX) and ISI, disease course (DU), and gender (GD). Drink (DR) is positively correlated with GD, while degree of education (DOE) is connected within demographic clusters and has an edge with GD. Conclusions Network analysis revealed that in the depressive network of patients with hypertension, anhedonia is the most central symptom, indicating that it may become a primary intervention target. The comprehensive network uncovered significant interconnections among depression, anxiety, and insomnia. Furthermore, the resilience dimension negatively correlates with depressive symptoms, while there are edge connections between exercise and both insomnia and demographic factors, highlighting modifiable protective factors.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827570fc35cd7a8845fe1https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1751228
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper