PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Quantifying consumptive water footprints of soybean in rainfed and irrigated systems under climate change scenarios

WBWilfredo BarreraFMFrancesco MorbidiniCMCarmelo Maucieri

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of climate change on consumptive water footprints of soybean in different irrigation systems.
  • Utilized the AquaCrop model for simulations
  • Assessed baseline and future climate scenarios
  • Applied Shared Socio-economic Pathways for emissions scenarios
  • Compared water footprints in rainfed vs. irrigated systems
  • Baseline water footprints varied by location, with the highest in Cesa and lowest in Ljubljana.
  • WF rainfed projected to increase under certain climate scenarios from mid to far future.
  • Irrigation strategies showed minimal effects on consumptive water footprints but influenced blue water use and yield.

Abstract

Introduction Understanding climate change impacts on water footprints (WFs) is crucial for sustainable soybean production. Methods We utilized previously calibrated AquaCrop model to assess baseline (1981–2010) and future climate change impacts on soybean WFs under Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) emission scenarios (SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5) in rainfed and irrigated systems. Results The WF rainfed varied across locations in the baseline period, with Cesa having the highest values and Ljubljana the lowest. Blue WF and WF irrigated increased as the readily available water (RAW) depletion threshold for irrigation decreased, with no significant differences in WF irrigated across irrigation strategies. Future climate change showed varying effects on WF rainfed and WF irrigated . Under SSP1-2.6 and SSP5- 8.5, WF rainfed is projected to increase from mid (2061–2080) to far future (2081– 2100). Whereas, a decrease is projected from near (2041–2060) to far future under SSP2-4.5. WF irrigated is expected to decrease in Castelfranco and Cesa but to increase in Ljubljana. Under SSP5-8.5, WF irrigated increased from near to far future. Whereas, SSP2-4.5 showed a decline, except in Ljubljana from near to mid-future. Under SSP1-2.6, WF irrigated decreased from near to mid-future but increased from mid to far future. Blue WF followed similar patterns to these projections. Irrigation strategies have minimal effects on consumptive WFs but significantly influence blue water use and yield. Discussion Future climate change will differentially impact rainfed and irrigated soybean WFs, emphasizing the need for targeted irrigation water management strategies. The findings are essential to making informed decisions for sustainable soybean production in the study areas.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barrera et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827570fc35cd7a8845ff3https://doi.org/10.3389/fagro.2026.1748798
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper