PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Individualised aerobic and resistance exercise training improves exercise tolerance in individuals with Long COVID: findings from the PERCEIVE randomised controlled trial

View Full Paper
EHE J HowdenLBLauren BurnhamJSJoel Smith

Key Points

  • Evaluate the effects of a multidisciplinary exercise intervention on exercise tolerance in individuals with Long COVID.
  • Multicenter, two-arm, parallel randomised controlled trial design
  • Participants enrolled with ongoing symptoms and reduced peak oxygen uptake
  • Comparison of multidisciplinary exercise intervention (MExT) versus usual care (UC)
  • Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) was conducted at baseline and follow-up
  • Monitoring of exercise adherence using heart monitors
  • MExT group showed increased indexed VO2 peak by 1.74 mL kg-1 min-1 compared to UC (p=0.001)
  • Absolute VO2 increased by 0.14 L.min-1 in the MExT group (p=0.003)
  • Peak watts improved by 11.5w in MExT (p=0.002)
  • No significant changes observed in mood or quality of life assessments

Abstract

Abstract Background "Long COVID" is reported to occur in about 10% of people after COVID-19 infection, with predominant symptoms of exercise intolerance and fatigue. Exercise training is an effective treatment for these symptoms in other settings, but may have adverse sequelae in chronic fatigue syndrome, which overlaps with Long COVID. The efficacy of training in Long COVID is unknown. Purpose To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary exercise intervention (MExT) including medical management of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and a 6-month personalized supervised aerobic and resistance exercise training program in an randomised control trial (RCT) comparison with usual care (UC) in people with long COVID. Method In this multicenter, two-arm, parallel, RCT we enrolled adults who were experiencing ongoing symptoms (12 weeks) and a reduced VO2 peak ( age-sex-predicted) following acute COVID-19. Participants were randomised (stratified by age 40-64; 65 and hospitalization status) to MExT (personalised exercise training + medical management of LV dysfunction and CV risk factors) vs UC for 6-months, with baseline and follow-up cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The primary outcome was change in peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak). Secondary outcomes included change in quality of life (AQoL-8D) and mood (PHQ-9). Exercise prescription and adherence were monitored via heart monitors. Results In total 133 participants (mean age, 53±9 years; 87 females (65%) and 46 males (35%)) were randomised 1:1 to MExT (n=66) or UC (67) between October 2022 – May 2024, 11 5-29 months post-acute infection and 57 MExT and 60 UC participants completed follow-up testing. The MExT group completed a median of 53 aerobic (range 2-225) and median of 68 resistance (range 1-68 sessions) exercise sessions over the 6-month period and received CV risk factor optimization (50%) or initiation of cardioprotective therapy (27%). The CPETs results are summarised in the table. At 6 months, there were between group differences in indexed VO2 peak of 1.74 mL kg-1 min-1(95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71, 2.76) p= 0.001), absolute VO2 of 0.14 L.min-1(95% CI: 0.05, 0.22; p value =0.003) and peak watts of 11.5w (95%CI: 4.3, 18.7, p=0.002). Other CPET parameters were not statistically different at 6-months (Ve/VCO2 slope, RER), except for peak HR which was ~6 beats lower in UC. There was no significant effect of the intervention on mood (PHQ-9 between group difference 0.60 (-0.82, 2.02; p = 0.40) or quality of life (AQoL-8D score 0.01(-0.04, 0.06; p =0.72). Conclusion These results suggest that a carefully supervised and individualised exercise program improves cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with long COVID.Table.Effects of exercise training

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Howden et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988278b0fc35cd7a884669fhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3929
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Effectiveness of Physical Activity in Long COVID-19 Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis2026
  2. 2Effects of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Clinical Symptom Burden in Long COVID2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in COVID-19 patients at 3 months follow-up2021 · 7 citations
  4. 4Investigating the relationship between minute ventilation and metabolic contribution in long COVID: A retrospective cohort study utilizing cardiopulmonary exercise testing2024
  5. 5Optimizing cardiopulmonary rehabilitation duration for long COVID patients: an exercise physiology monitoring approach2024 · 7 citations