PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Clinical Outcomes in Acute and Chronic Myeloid and Lymphoid Leukemias

BCBryan ChanEBEesha BalarSVSeiichi Villalona

Key Points

  • The review aims to summarize the role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in evaluating treatment effects in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.
  • Qualitative narrative synthesis of literature on PROM use in leukemia clinical trials.
  • Focus on critical themes: symptoms, emotional and social status, and functional health.
  • Evaluation of established PROMs such as EORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-Leu.
  • PROMs were linked to clinical outcomes like disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
  • FACT-Leu scales were found to be independent predictors of overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
  • Improved patient-provider communication and satisfaction through the incorporation of PROMs.

Abstract

Introduction: This review specifically focuses on interventional clinical trials in leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), summarizing how patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been implemented to evaluate treatment effects rather than to directly influence clinical outcomes. Objective: Clinical outcomes of interest typically include response rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are standardized questionnaires that collect information regarding health outcomes directly from the patient and are used to evaluate new treatments and healthcare quality. In addition, the use of PROMs in cancer care has been shown to improve patient-provider communication and patient satisfaction. Material and Methods: This is a qualitative, narrative synthesis and review structured around PROMs focused on six critical themes: symptoms/symptom burden, physical, emotional, social/role, and functional status, and global health status measurement. Results: PROMs that are assessed in oncologic research include the EORTC QLQ-C30, FACT-Leu, QLQ-CLL16, and EQ-5D. PROs are associated with clinical outcomes such as DFS and OS, and the FACT-Leu scales, HRQOL and physical functioning scores were independent prognosticators of OS in patients with AML. Conclusions: Through our review, notable trends were identified that further highlight the importance of greater incorporation of PRO measures in future clinical trials, particularly in the understudied realm of hematologic malignancies, in order to better delineate the link between survival and HRQOL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827a20fc35cd7a884680chttps://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep18010015
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimisation of patient-reported outcome measurement for haematological cancer patients receiving novel immunotherapies: perspectives of multi-stakeholders2026
  2. 2Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in a Medical Oncology Setting (the iPROMOS Study): Type II Hybrid Implementation Study2024 · 6 citations
  3. 3Assessing patient-reported outcomes in Phase 3 multiple myeloma trials between 2020-2024 – a systematic review.2025
  4. 4Effects of an Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (e‐PROMs) Program on Symptom Reporting, Use of Healthcare, and Overall Survival in Patients With Lymphoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study2025 · 5 citations
  5. 5PROMIS in oncology: A review of current applications and practical considerations for clinical integration2026 · 1 citations