PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Screening of atrial fibrillation episode in patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters

View Full Paper
JLJ LiaoLKLing KuoCTC T Tsai

Key Result

7-day ECG monitoring detected AF in 11.9% of patients with abnormal echocardiography, with highest AF rates in E/e' (23.4%), LA enlargement (20.4%), and diastolic dysfunction (20.6%) groups.

Key Points

  • The aim is to determine the effectiveness of continuous ECG monitoring in detecting atrial fibrillation among patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters.
  • Enrolled 118 patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters for 7-day ECG monitoring.
  • Recorded patients' heart activity using 30-second ECG segments and continuous monitoring at follow-up intervals.
  • Analyzed ECG data to identify episodes of atrial fibrillation and assessed different echocardiographic criteria.
  • Atrial fibrillation was detected in 14 patients (11.9%) over the monitoring period.
  • Detection rates varied by echocardiographic criteria: 20.4% for left atrial enlargement and 23.4% for E/e’ > 14.
  • The highest incident AF rate (32%) was observed in the 'LAE + E/e’' group.

Structured PICO

Does extended 7-day ECG monitoring detect atrial fibrillation in patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters?

P
Population
118 patients, aged 66.1 ± 15.3 years, without known atrial fibrillation but with abnormal echocardiography parameters (LA enlargement, LVH, E/e’ > 14, grade II/III diastolic dysfunction, VHD, or HF).
I
Intervention
7-day continuous single-strip ECG monitoring and 30-second ECG recording at enrollment, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months follow-up.
O
Outcome
Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF)

Extended 7-day ECG monitoring over 12 months effectively detects incident atrial fibrillation in 11.9% of patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters, particularly those with left atrial enlargement or elevated E/e'.

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia, and proper management can improve prognosis. However, AF can be paroxysmal and asymptomatic, causing delayed diagnosis. Although AF screening is important, the best strategy remains unclear. Methods We enrolled 118 patients, aged 66.1 ± 15.3 years without AF but with abnormal echocardiography parameters, for 7-day continuous single-strip ECG monitoring. The criteria included LA enlargement, LVH, E/e’ 14, grade II/III diastolic dysfunction, VHD, or HF. Patients received a 30-second ECG recording and 7-day ECG monitoring at enrollment and at three, six, nine, and twelve months follow-up. (Figure 1) The endpoint was the detection of AF. Results Out of 118 enrollees, 57 met the HF criterion, 54 met the LAE criterion, 26 met the LVH criterion, 47 met the E/e’ criterion, 34 met the diastolic dysfunction criterion, and 15 met the VHD criterion. Criteria categories were not mutually exclusive; patients could meet multiple criteria. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (55.1%), followed by CKD (40.7%) and HF (39%). AF was detected in 14 patients (11.9%) through 7-day ECG recordings, not 12-lead ECGs, with 12 patients receiving oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention. AF was found in 7 patients during the first 7-day ECG, 3 at the 3rd month, 2 at the 6th month, and 2 at the 9th month. Among these 14 patients, AF appeared in four recordings for one patient, two recordings for five patients, and one recording for eight patients. The rates of incident AF for each criteria group were as follows: 5.3% for HF, 20.4% for LAE, 7.7% for LVH, 23.4% for E/e’, 20.6% for diastolic dysfunction, and 6.7% for VHD. (Figure 2) Detection rates were also calculated by analyzing patients who met combinations of two different criteria. The "LAE + E/e’" group had the highest rate of incident AF at 32%, followed by the "HF + E/e’", "LAE + diastolic dysfunction," "LVH + VHD," and "E/e’ + diastolic dysfunction" groups, each with approximately 20%. The "HF + LVH" and "HF + VHD" subgroups showed no detection of AF. Conclusions Extended ECG monitoring effectively detects AF in patients with abnormal echocardiographic parameters, especially those with elevated E/e’, LAE, or diastolic dysfunction, supporting targeted monitoring to improve AF diagnosis.Study protocol AF detection in different groups

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liao et al. (2025) studied this question. 7-day ECG monitoring detected AF in 11.9% of patients with abnormal echocardiography, with highest AF rates in E/e' (23.4%), LA enlargement (20.4%), and diastolic dysfunction (20.6%) groups.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827b40fc35cd7a884693ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.442
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Determining The Risk of Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysm in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Intact and Reduced Ejection Fraction2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2STRATIFICATION OF HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS ACCORDING TO RISK SCORE – CONTRIBUTION TO PREVENTION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION?2026
  3. 3Detection of unknown atrial fibrillation by prolonged ECG monitoring in an all-comer patient cohort and association with clinical and Holter variables2020 · 14 citations
  4. 4Feasibility of Extended Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Monitoring to Identify Silent Atrial Fibrillation in High‐risk Patients: The Screening Study for Undiagnosed Atrial Fibrillation ( STUDY‐AF )2015 · 102 citations
  5. 5Beyond atrial fibrillation screening: characterizing other clinically relevant arrhythmias detected during 14-day electrocardiogram monitoring2026