PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Nutrients0 citationsOpen Access

Dietary Behavior Clustering and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in a Large Population Cohort

MLMauro LombardoGAGiovanni AulisaFMFares M. S. Muthanna

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the relationship between dietary patterns and cardiovascular health markers in a large population cohort.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional study with 2461 adults completing an online survey about eating habits.
  • Used principal component analysis to identify dietary profiles from eating behaviors.
  • Calculated a heart-healthy diet score based on food preferences.
  • Performed ANOVA and adjusted regression analyses to link dietary profiles with body composition measures.
  • Identified four dietary profiles: structured, social, irregular, and disordered eaters.
  • Structured eaters exhibited the lowest BMI (26.8 kg/m2) and fat mass (28.9%).
  • Disordered eaters had the highest BMI (29.0 kg/m2) and fat mass (31.2%), along with the lowest dietary score (3.93).
  • Dose-response analysis revealed a significant association between disordered eating and adverse health outcomes.

Abstract

Background: Eating habits influence cardiometabolic health alongside traditional dietary measures. However, the links between dietary patterns, body composition, and heart-healthy food preferences remain under-explored in large cohorts. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 2461 adults (aged 18 to 75 years) completed an online survey on eating behaviors, food preferences, and lifestyle. Principal component analysis (PCA) of seven behaviors identified dietary profiles. A heart-healthy diet score (range −2 to 10; higher = greater preference for fruit, vegetables, legumes, fish, and less meat/processed meat) was derived from these food preferences. ANOVA and adjusted regressions linked the profiles to BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, and diet score. Results: Four profiles emerged: structured, social, irregular, and disordered eaters. Structured eaters had the lowest BMI (26.8 ± 5.1 kg/m2), lowest fat mass (28.9 ± 9.4%), and highest dietary score (4.73 ± 2.0). Disorganized eaters had the highest BMI (29.0 ± 5.5 kg/m2), the highest fat mass (31.2 ± 8.8%) and the lowest score (3.93 ± 2.0); all p < 0.05. Dose–response analyses confirmed that greater disordered eating (PCA1) was associated with worse outcomes. Conclusions: Dietary profiles are associated with body composition and cardioprotective preferences. Behavioral assessment could refine the identification of cardiometabolic risk and personalize nutrition.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lombardo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827b40fc35cd7a88469a2https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18030533
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper