PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Follow-up of left-ventricular assist device patients with telemonitoring: a national retrospective multicentric study on the Satelia LVAD web application

View Full Paper
CDC. DelmasASA S SimoniCGC. Goeminne

Key Result

Remote monitoring via Satelia® LVAD was feasible with 79% compliance, detecting 9,878 hospitalization risk alerts and resolving nearly half, mainly cardiac decompensation.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the usefulness of remote monitoring for patients with left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs).
  • Conducted a national retrospective study at nine tertiary hospitals.
  • Included LVAD patients using the Satelia LVAD web application for follow-up.
  • Collected data on patient characteristics and hospitalization risk alerts.
  • Included 161 patients, predominantly male (82%) and with a mean age of 62.2 years.
  • Patients mainly received LVAD for ischemic cardiomyopathy (82%) and as a bridge to transplant (50.3%).
  • Compliance to remote monitoring was 79%, with a mean follow-up of 19.9 months.
  • Recorded 8,265 orange alerts (72.3%) and 1,613 red alerts (14.1%), with nearly half resolved.

Structured PICO

Does remote monitoring via a web application facilitate follow-up and detect hospitalization risk alerts in LVAD patients?

P
Population
161 patients with advanced heart failure and a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD), mean age 62.2 years, 82.0% male. Indications mainly ischemic cardiomyopathy (82.0%) and bridge to transplant (50.3%).
I
Intervention
Remote monitoring via a web application (Satelia LVAD)
O
Outcome
Patient and medical characteristics, and detected hospitalization risk alerts

Remote monitoring via a dedicated web application is feasible for LVAD patients, demonstrating high compliance and the ability to detect hospitalization risk alerts.

Abstract

Abstract Background Left-ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a major therapeutic option for advanced heart failure (adHF) patients as both destination or bridge to transplant therapy (BTT). LVAD has been reported to improve patient’s survival and quality of life (QoL), but complications can alter their prognosis. Specialized remote monitoring may facilitate LVAD’s patient’s follow-up and improve their outcomes. Aims To describe and evaluate the usefulness of remote monitoring for LVAD patients. Methods A national retrospective study was conducted at nine tertiary hospitals. LVAD patients that were followed-up with a web application (Satelia® LVAD) were included. Data collected involved patient and medical characteristics, and detected hospitalization risk alerts. Results In total, 161 patients were included (male=82.0%, mean age=62.2 years). Indications for LVAD were mainly ischemic cardiomyopathy (82.0%) and BTT (50.3%). The mean follow-up duration lasted 19.9 1,45 months with 76 (47.2%) patients continuing remote monitoring. Compliance to remote monitoring was relatively high (79.0%). The main reason for cessation was death (30.6%). Total hospitalization risk alerts detected by remote monitoring were: orange alerts (n=8,265, 72.3%) and red alerts (n=1,613, 14.1%) with 48.5% of cases resolved (orange=50.8% vs red=54.8%). The most frequent type of resolved alert was for a measured risk of cardiac decompensation (orange=2,227 vs red=382). Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first extensive study to describe the follow-up of LVAD patients by dedicated remote monitoring program. Remote monitoring as a specific follow-up tool may be feasible for this sub population. Future randomized studies on specific prospective evaluations such as survival and QoL are needed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Delmas et al. (2025) studied this question. Remote monitoring via Satelia® LVAD was feasible with 79% compliance, detecting 9,878 hospitalization risk alerts and resolving nearly half, mainly cardiac decompensation.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827c90fc35cd7a8846c04https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1396
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper