PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia0 citationsOpen Access

TOP Flat Magnetic Stimulation therapy for post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence

NMNicola MondainiFCFabio CrocerossaMGMauro Gacci

Key Points

  • To assess the impact of Flat Magnetic Stimulation on male stress urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy.
  • Conducted a retrospective analysis of 40 patients with stress urinary incontinence post-RP.
  • Participants underwent eight sessions of Flat Magnetic Stimulation therapy.
  • Administered the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form at baseline and 3 months follow-up.
  • Total IIQ-7 median score significantly reduced from 71.35 at baseline to 28.54 at 3MFU (p < 0.05).
  • Scores for each questionnaire item decreased from baseline to 3MFU.
  • No adverse events were reported during the treatment period.

Abstract

Background: The most frequent complication in subjects of a radical prostatectomy (RP) is represented by urinary incontinence (UI), which can arise following the destruction of the pelvic floor muscles. Objectives: The aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the effect of Flat Magnetic Stimulation (FMS) in treating male stress urine incontinence (SUI) following RP. Materials and methods: A total of 40 patients affected by SUI after RP, with a mean age of 56.8 (± 5.7) years old, underwent eight sessions with FMS. The Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-Short Form (IIQ-7) was administered from baseline up to 3 months of follow-up (3MFU) after the last treatment session. All possible adverse events were retrospective analysed. Results: The analysis demonstrates that the scores for each individual questionnaire item decreased from baseline up to 3MFU after the last treatment session, leading to a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the total IIQ-7 median score from 71.35 (66.6-76.11) at baseline to 28.54 (38.05-23.78) at 3MFU after the last treatment session. No adverse events were recorded over the whole course of treatment. Conclusions: Our findings reveal that this technology may serve as a convenient and alternative treatment option for stress-caused urinary incontinence following RP.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mondaini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828210fc35cd7a8847612https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14666
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper