PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026EPJ Quantum Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Fast quantum amplitude encoding of typical classical data

VPVittorio PagniSHSigurd HuberMEMichael Epping

Key Points

  • To develop a faster quantum amplitude encoding scheme for classical data, seeking efficiency in quantum state preparation.
  • Improvements to existing quantum amplitude encoding techniques
  • Evaluation of input vectors with complex entries
  • Analysis of runtime dependent on data density and parallelization parameter
  • Numerical evidence from real-world data like radar satellite images
  • Achieved quadratic speed-up compared to traditional methods
  • Demonstrated scaling of qubit preparation at O(M log N)
  • Average runtime improvement to O(log^1.5 N) with uniformly sampled input vectors
  • Potential advantages for processing real-world data efficiently

Abstract

Abstract We present an improved version of a quantum amplitude encoding scheme that encodes the N entries of a unit classical vector v= (v₁,. . , v₍) v = (v 1,. . , v N) into the amplitudes of a quantum state. Our approach has a quadratic speed-up with respect to the original one. We also describe several generalizations, including to complex entries of the input vector and a parameter M that determines the parallelization. The number of qubits required for the state preparation scales as O (M N) O (M log N). The runtime, which depends on the data density ρ and on the parallelization paramater M, scales as O (1NM (M+1) ) O (1 ρ N M log (M + 1) ), which in the most parallel version (M=N M = N) is always less or equal than O (N N) O (N log N). By analysing the data density, we prove that the average runtime is O (^1. 5 N) O (log 1. 5 N) for input vectors that are uniformly sampled on the N -sphere. We present numerical evidence that this favourable runtime behaviour also holds for real-world data, such as radar satellite images. This is promising as it allows for an input-to-output advantage of the quantum Fourier transform.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pagni et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828210fc35cd7a884765ehttps://doi.org/10.1140/epjqt/s40507-026-00473-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1An algorithm for the machine calculation of complex Fourier series1965 · 12,345 citations
  2. 2A quantum k-nearest neighbors algorithm based on the Euclidean distance estimation2024 · 38 citations
  3. 3Pure-state tomography with parallel unentangled measurements2023 · 7 citations
  4. 4Automatic Uniform Quantum State Preparation Using Decision Diagrams2020 · 10 citations
  5. 5Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer1997 · 6,019 citations