PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

A systematic-scoping review on sex-based differences in type-2 myocardial infarction (T2MI)

View Full Paper
SLShehzeen LalaniMYMariya YordanovaMDM D'angelo

Key Result

Women are 31% more likely than men to have Type 2 myocardial infarction (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.74; P<0.001) according to meta-analysis of 3.3 million patients.

Key Points

  • This research aims to provide a comprehensive overview of sex-based differences in type 2 myocardial infarction, including incidence and outcomes.
  • Conducted a systematic-scoping review of retrospective and prospective studies.
  • Included databases: Web of Science, OVID, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, PUBMED.
  • Pooled odds ratios calculated using meta-analyses in Stata.
  • 28 studies included after full-text screening from 1388 articles.
  • Men are significantly less likely than women to have T2MI (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.74; P<0.001).
  • Women with T2MI are generally older and have a higher prevalence of hypertension than men.
  • Mortality rates are higher in men, although some evidence suggests differing diabetes and treatment rates between sexes.

Structured PICO

Are there sex-based differences in the incidence, comorbidities, clinical management, and outcomes of Type 2 myocardial infarction?

P
Population
3,292,727 participants (618,535 with Type 2 myocardial infarction, 47.5% female) from 13 studies included in the meta-analysis.
I
Intervention
Male sex
C
Comparator
Female sex
O
Outcome
Likelihood of Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI)hard clinical

This meta-analysis demonstrates that Type 2 myocardial infarction is significantly more prevalent in women than men, with notable sex-based differences in comorbidities, angiographic findings, and mortality.

Limitations

  • Limited data on treatment differences

Abstract

Abstract Background Worldwide, cardiovascular disease remains a primary cause of death, with notable differences between sexes. While sex differences in Type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) are well recognized, those in Type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) are less understood and may influence clinical practice and provide valuable prognostic insights. Purpose We aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of sex-based differences in incidence, comorbidities, clinical management, and outcomes of T2MI. Methods A systematic-scoping review of retrospective and prospective studies examining the differences in T2MI by sex was conducted by three-independent reviewers. Six databases were included in the search strategy (Web of Science, OVID, SCOPUS, EMBASE, CINAHL, PUBMED), and were last searched on November 29, 2024. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) of T2MI gender differences were calculated using aggregated meta-analyses in Stata. Results The search strategy resulted in 1388 articles and 28 studies were included after the full-text screening (Figure 1). Thirteen of these were included in the meta-analysis on the likelihood of T2MI by gender, with 3,292,727 participants in total (618,535 T2MI, of which 47.5% were female). Meta-analysis displayed that men were significantly less likely than women to have T2MI (OR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.63-0.74; P0.001) (Figure 2). Women with T2MI were generally older and had a higher prevalence of hypertension than men (n=5). While some studies found higher diabetes rates in men (n=2), others reported a greater history of prior PCI or CABG in this group (n=4). Coronary artery disease (CAD) was less frequently observed on angiography in women (n=3) compared to men. Mortality, both short- and long-term, was higher in men (n=4), though one study contradicted this finding (n=1). Although data on treatment differences were limited, some evidence suggested greater ASA use in men (n=2). Conclusion This is the first comprehensive overview of sex-based differences in T2MI. Our study demonstrated that T2MIs are more prevalent in females, highlighting key differences among genders. In sum, data is limited, and further research is needed on gender-specific factors in T2MI to improve diagnosis, management, and mortality rates.Figure 1:PRISMA Diagram Figure 2:Forest plot of unadjusted odd

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lalani et al. (2025) studied this question. Women are 31% more likely than men to have Type 2 myocardial infarction (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.63-0.74; P<0.001) according to meta-analysis of 3.3 million patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828210fc35cd7a884769bhttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.1932
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper