PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Applied Sciences0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Study of a Short-Term Assessment of Corrosion Initiation Behavior of Steel Reinforcement in Cementitious vs. Alkali-Activated Fly Ash Geopolymer Binders

AHAndreea HegyiACAlexandra CsapaiALAdrian-Victor Lăzărescu

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the short-term corrosion initiation behavior of steel reinforcement in various binder types, focusing on durability.
  • Conducted a comparative analysis of corrosion initiation in different geopolymer binders and a cementitious paste.
  • Utilized electrochemical techniques like Open Circuit Potential (OCP) and linear polarization tests.
  • Characterized samples further using microstructural techniques including porosimetry, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).
  • Detected varying corrosion rates across the different binder types.
  • Showed that geopolymer binders exhibit distinct corrosion behaviors compared to traditional cementitious pastes.
  • Reinforcement embedded in geopolymer binders demonstrated potential advantages in long-term durability.

Abstract

The long-term durability and structural integrity of modern buildings, which are inherently reliant on reinforced concrete, are governed by the rate of corrosion of embedded steel reinforcement. Corrosion kinetics, therefore, is not merely an academic exercise, but rather a critical foundation for predicting and extending a structure’s life span, mitigating safety risks, and ensuring the sustainability of the built environment against a host of environmental and chemical degradation factors. The present study conducts a comparative analysis of the short-term corrosion initiation behavior of steel reinforcement embedded in three distinct types of geopolymer binders, a cementitious paste, and a cementitious composite with natural aggregates. Electrochemical techniques, such as Open Circuit Potential (OCP) and linear polarization tests were used to characterize the behavior of the steel reinforcement embedded in the 4 types of samples. Additionally, these samples containing the reinforcement were further characterized using advanced microstructural techniques, specifically porosimetry, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR), and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hegyi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828530fc35cd7a8847b58https://doi.org/10.3390/app16031623
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Passivation of Steel Reinforcement in Low Carbon Concrete2024 · 10 citations
  2. 2Corrosion characteristics of rebar in Fly Ash-GGBFS synthesised alkali activated concrete2024 · 1 citations
  3. 3Evaluation of Different Mix Parameters Related to Alkaline Activator on Microstructure and Rebar Corrosion Behavior of Chloride-Added Fly Ash–Based Geopolymer Concrete2026
  4. 4Electrochemical Evaluation of an Alkali Activated Eco-Cellular Geopolymer Concrete for the Mitigation of Reinforcing Steel Corrosion in Chloride Containing Environments2026
  5. 5Carbonation and corrosion of steel in fly ash concrete, concluding investigation of five-year-old laboratory specimens and preliminary field data2024 · 3 citations