PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Journal of Linguistics0 citationsOpen Access

No escape from syntax: Gĩkũyũ nominalizations and the Complex Head analysis

SLSoo-Hwan Lee

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to clarify the nature of nominalizations in Gĩkũyũ and the relationship between lexicon and syntax.
  • Revisits Mugane's (1997) classifications of Gĩkũyũ nominalizations.
  • Applies Wood’s (2023) Complex Head analysis to the nominalizations.
  • Examines the lexical and syntactic properties of [mu… a]-type and [mu… i]-type nominalizations.
  • Determines that [mu… a]-type nominalizations can be explained syntactically.
  • Confirms that both types of nominalizations can be accounted for within a single syntactic framework.
  • Resolves the previously identified puzzle about the nature of Gĩkũyũ nominalizations.

Abstract

Abstract Mugane (1997) identifies two types of individual-denoting nominalizations in Gĩkũyũ (Bantu): the mu… a-type and the mu… i-type. He argues that the mu… i-type nominalizations are phrasal and that the mu… a-type nominalizations exhibit a puzzling nature, displaying both lexical and syntactic properties. This study examines Mugane’s characterization, revisiting the notion of a lexicon-syntax divide. Applying Wood’s (2023) Complex Head analysis, I demonstrate that we can explain the mu… a-type nominalizations within a syntactic framework without resorting to the lexicon. The analysis reveals that the puzzle is resolvable and that syntax can account for both types of nominalizations in Gĩkũyũ.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Soo-Hwan Lee (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828620fc35cd7a8847ccehttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226726101133
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper