PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Cytotoxic Ruthenium(II)‐Diphosphine Complexes Affect the Mitochondrial Respiration of Lung Cancer Cells

View Full Paper
MPMarcos Vinícius Palmeira-MelloPMPierre MesdomPBPierre Bürckel

Key Result

Ruthenium(II)-diphosphine compounds showed potent cytotoxicity with IC50 as low as 0.48 μM on A549 lung cancer cells by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.

Key Points

  • To investigate the effects of ruthenium(II) diphosphine complexes on mitochondrial respiration in lung cancer cells.
  • Synthesis and characterization of six ruthenium(II) diphosphine compounds.
  • Cytotoxicity assessment via IC50 values on A549 lung cancer cells.
  • Clonogenic and migration assays to evaluate antiproliferative effects.
  • Analysis of cellular accumulation using ICP-MS and mitochondrial function assessed by JC-1 and Mito Stress tests.
  • IC50 values of 0.48 μM and 0.80 μM observed for specific ruthenium complexes.
  • Compounds showed effective antiproliferative and anti-migratory properties.
  • Cellular accumulation indicated localization primarily in the nucleus, with minimal presence in mitochondria.
  • Mitochondrial dysfunction confirmed through alterations in mitochondrial membrane potential and oxygen consumption rate.

Structured PICO

P
Population
A549 cancer cells
I
Intervention
Six Ruthenium(II)‐diphosphine compounds containing different mercapto ligands (N−S), with general formula [Ru(N−S)(dppm)2]Cl
O
Outcome
Cytotoxicity (IC50), antiproliferative and anti-migratory capacity, cellular accumulation, and mitochondrial respirationsurrogate

Ruthenium(II)‐diphosphine compounds demonstrate promising anticancer potential by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction and altering oxygen consumption in A549 cancer cells.

Abstract

In this work, we studied six Ruthenium (II) ‐diphosphine compounds containing different mercapto ligands (N−S), with general formula Ru (N−S) (dppm) ₂Cl (dppm=1, 1‐bis (diphenylphosphino) methane). These compounds were characterized by several techniques (NMR ^1H, ^31P (^1H), and ^13C, HRMS, IR, UV‐Vis and XRD) and their purity confirmed by elemental analysis. DLS experiments revealed low diameters and polydispersity indexes, and positive log P values in n‐octanol/PBS indicated their preference for the organic phase. In general, these compounds are stable in different media over 48 h. Cytotoxicity experiments revealed promising IC₅₀ values on A549 breast cancer cells, 0. 48 μM and 0. 80 μM for Ru (mtz) (dppm) ₂Cl (1) and Ru (mmi) (dppm) ₂Cl (2), respectively (mtz and mmi are 2‐mercapto‐2‐thiazoline and mercapto‐1‐methylimidazole in their deprotonated form, respectively). Clonogenic and migration experiments indicated their antiproliferative and anti‐migratory capacity. ICP‐MS results indicated their cellular accumulation in the nucleus, with little amounts in mitochondria. No covalent DNA binding was observed by ICP‐MS. JC‐1 and cell Mito Stress test confirmed mitochondrial dysfunction, which was verified by mitochondrial membrane potential uncoupling and drastic alterations in the oxygen consumption rate. Taken together, our results provide crucial insights regarding the anticancer potential of ruthenium (II) ‐phosphine compounds.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Palmeira-Mello et al. (2025) studied this question. Ruthenium(II)-diphosphine compounds showed potent cytotoxicity with IC50 as low as 0.48 μM on A549 lung cancer cells by inducing mitochondrial dysfunction.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828770fc35cd7a884804dhttps://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-290942
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper