PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Machines0 citationsOpen Access

In-Process Evaluation of Deposition Efficiency in Laser Metal Deposition

View Full Paper
AAAndrea AngelastroMLMarco LatteMMMarco Mazzarisi

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a real-time methodology for evaluating deposition efficiency in laser metal deposition processes.
  • Utilized an innovative in-process methodology for deposition efficiency assessment.
  • Employed a laser line scanning system to collect end-track scan data.
  • Estimated deposited volume and efficiency for each deposition track.
  • Validation tests indicated the method's ability to detect defects from nozzle conditions.
  • Average deviation from metallographic measurements was 4.3%.
  • The methodology supports timely identification of powder feeding anomalies.

Abstract

Laser Metal Deposition (LMD) is an advanced Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology widely used for metal component fabrication, cladding, and repair. Despite its potential, issues such as geometrical inaccuracies and deposition flaws can significantly affect part quality and process efficiency. Existing optical monitoring approaches mainly focus on geometric features and generally do not provide real-time estimates of deposition efficiency, which is critical for both product performance and resource utilization. Furthermore, evaluating deposition efficiency in industrial settings is often time-consuming and difficult to implement. This preliminary study introduces an innovative in-process methodology for assessing deposition efficiency during multi-track deposition. The approach exploits end-track scan data acquired by a laser line scanning system to estimate the deposited volume and the corresponding deposition efficiency for each track. A validation test on a two-layer sample demonstrates the capability of the method to detect defects induced by partially clogged and non-clogged nozzle conditions. Comparison with metallographic measurements shows an average deviation of 4.3%. By enabling timely identification of powder feeding anomalies and supporting improved powder utilization, the proposed methodology contributes to waste reduction, enhanced process stability, and more sustainable industrial implementation of LMD.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Angelastro et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828850fc35cd7a88480dchttps://doi.org/10.3390/machines14020182
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper