PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Alveolar Ridge Dimensions Following Immediate Implantation with and Without Buccal Gap Filling Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
TSTahereh SahraeiHSHasan SemyariMTmaryam tehranchi

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate how alveolar ridge dimensions change after immediate implantation with or without filling the buccal gap.
  • Conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial involving 15 patients with 26 hopeless teeth.
  • Divided patients into two groups: one received allograft gap filling while the other did not.
  • Measured ridge dimensions and buccal plate thickness using cone-beam computed tomography at 2 days and 4 months postoperatively.
  • Analyzed changes in dimensions with a mixed-effects model.
  • No significant differences in alveolar ridge and buccal plate resorption were observed between the test and control groups with a minimum buccal plate thickness of one millimeter.

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to assess the changes in alveolar ridge dimensions following immediate implantation with and without buccal gap filling using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods This prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted on 15 patients (mean age = 44.7 years) with 26 hopeless teeth. The teeth were extracted and immediately replaced with implants. The patients were randomly assigned to two test and control groups (N=13 implants each). In the test group, the gap around the implants was filled with allograft, while the control group did not receive buccal gap filling. CBCT scans were obtained at two days and four months postoperatively. The buccolingual ridge dimensions, buccal plate thickness, and buccal gap distance were measured at the implant platform and 2 and 4 mm apical to it, and changes were analyzed by the mixed-effects model (alpha = 0.05). Results In cases with a sound buccal plate having a minimum thickness of one millimeter, the alveolar ridge and buccal plate resorption were the same in the test and control groups. Conclusion: The results revealed that immediate implantation with and without buccal gap filling did not prevent alveolar ridge and buccal plate resorption

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sahraei et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828850fc35cd7a88481e6https://doi.org/10.22037/jds.v42i2.44875
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper