PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Planck Field: A Mechanical Resolution to Relativistic Infinities and the Singularity Problem - Reconciling the PSR B1913+16 Timing Residuals and the GW170817 Discrepancy

View Full Paper
RSRobin Skavberg

Key Points

  • The central aim is to develop a mechanical model that resolves singularities without redefining gravitational constants.
  • Introduced a refinement of the Metric Field incorporating matter, gravity, and time as a tensor field.
  • Analyzed the field's response as mass density approaches the Planck scale, focusing on impedance behavior.
  • Evaluated the model against PSR B1913+16 timing residuals and the GW170817 discrepancy.
  • The model predicts a geometric rigidity that acts as a threshold to prevent singularities.
  • Correlations observed between timing residuals and the field's transition to rigidity suggest better alignment with data.
  • The framework provides a new explanation for GW170817's speed of propagation and its relation to scalar impedance.

Abstract

This paper introduces a mechanical refinement of the Metric Field where we identify matter, gravity, and time as constituent components of a Tensor Field. We propose that these constituents are bound by the laws of physics to maintain an internal equilibrium within the field's structural capacity. We demonstrate that as mass density approaches the Planck scale, the field exhibits a saturation-dependent response as an impedance scalar. This creates a physical "floor" of geometric rigidity—a maximum structural threshold—that prevents the formation of singularities without requiring a redefinition of the gravitational constant G. Instead, the field's displacement reaches an asymptotic limit equal to Planck's density, precluding infinite density. We evaluate this framework against the Hulse-Taylor Binary (PSR B1913+16) timing residuals, demonstrating that the observed "lag" correlates with the field’s transition toward this rigidity. This model provides a more precise alignment with forty years of observational data by accounting for the field's internal resistance to extreme matter loading. We further evaluate the framework against the GW170817 discrepancy demonstating the effect on the speed of propagation due to the induced scalar impedance of the Tensor (Planck) field.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Robin Skavberg (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828ab0fc35cd7a884854fhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18496765
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper