PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Application of Intelligent Models in Investigating the Energy Dissipation in Labyrinth Weirs with Various Cycles Form

HAHamidreza AbbaszadehRTReza TarinejadJAJohn Abraham

Key Points

  • The study aims to assess energy dissipation in labyrinth weirs using various intelligent modeling techniques.
  • Utilized Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Artificial Neural Network for modeling.
  • Examined various configurations, scales, and cycle types of labyrinth weirs.
  • Applied statistical metrics to evaluate model performance.
  • Derived non-linear polynomial regression equations for relative energy dissipation.
  • RBF kernel in SVM showed R=0.907 and Mean RE=1.38%.
  • ANN model achieved higher accuracy with R=0.969 and Mean RE=0.73%.
  • RF model recorded R=0.878 and Mean RE=1.78%.
  • Single-cycle weirs demonstrated the highest energy dissipation among configurations.

Abstract

Weirs play a crucial role as hydraulic structures in the regulation and control of water flow. This study investigates the relative energy dissipation in labyrinth weirs, examining various configurations, scales, and cycle types, using advanced computational models like Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest (RF), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN). In SVM modelling, the results from different kernel functions reveal that the Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel outperforms polynomial, linear, and sigmoid kernels in predicting relative energy dissipation. For the RBF kernel, the statistical metrics were found to be (R=0.907), (Mean RE%=1.38), (RMSE=0.0153), and (KGE=0.744) in test phase. where RE, Mean RE, RMSE and KGE represent the Relative Error, Mean Relative Error, Root Mean Square Error and Kling Gupta Efficiency, respectively. In contrast, in the ANN model, the multilayer perceptron (MLP) network showed higher accuracy than the RBF network, achieving 0.969, 0.73%, 0.007, and 0.968 for the same indicators. For the RF model, these values were recorded as 0.878, 1.78%, 0.0192, and 0.362, respectively. Comparative analysis indicates that the ANN model offers superior predictive performance over SVM and RF models. Additionally, non-linear polynomial regression equations, derived from dimensionless parameters, are proposed for estimating relative energy dissipation. Notably, single-cycle weirs exhibited the greatest energy dissipation among the configurations studied.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abbaszadeh et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828b90fc35cd7a884866ahttps://doi.org/10.22055/jhs.2025.48309.1329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper