PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research0 citations

Cervical Cerclage at 17 Gestational Weeks for Delayed‐Interval Delivery at 15 and 27 Weeks of Gestation in a Dichorionic Twin Pregnancy: A Case Report

View Full Paper
MSMotomu SuzukiTIToshiyuki ItaiRSRyosuke Shindo

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the use of cervical cerclage for managing delayed-interval delivery in a twin pregnancy.
  • Case report of a 38-year-old primipara with dichorionic diamniotic pregnancy and multiple fibroids.
  • First twin delivered at 15 weeks and 3 days; cerclage performed at 17 weeks and 1 day.
  • Second twin delivered by caesarean section at 27 weeks and 2 days after premature rupture of membranes.
  • First twin delivered without complications; no uterine contractions or infections noted.
  • Cervical cerclage was successful in prolonging the pregnancy until second twin delivery.
  • Second twin weighed 922 g at delivery, indicating a viable but premature infant.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Delayed‐interval delivery refers to the delivery of the remaining fetus(es) at least 24 h after the delivery of the first fetus. There have been limited case reports of delayed‐interval deliveries in twin pregnancies whose delivery of the first twin occurred in the early second trimester. We report a delayed‐interval delivery of a dichorionic diamniotic pregnancy complicated by multiple fibroids. A 38‐year‐old primipara woman delivered the first twin at 15 weeks and 3 days of gestation. She did not have uterine contractions or any signs of infection, then McDonald cerclage was performed at 17 weeks and 1 day of gestation. At 27 weeks and 2 days of gestation, the second twin, 922 g, was delivered by caesarean section after premature rupture of membranes. Delayed‐interval delivery may be considered in the early second trimester if there is no evidence of uterine contractions or infection, even in patients at risk for preterm birth.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Suzuki et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828b90fc35cd7a884868ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/jog.70193
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper