PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Palliative & Supportive Care0 citationsOpen Access

Treatment-related differences in quality of life and psychological distress among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A cross-sectional analysis

YTYi-Tseng TsaiZLZan-Ting LuHKHsin-Yu Kuo

Key Points

  • This study examines how different treatments influence quality of life and psychological distress in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional analysis with 101 inpatients at a regional hospital in Taiwan.
  • Patients underwent diverse treatments: hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation, transarterial chemoembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, or immunotherapy.
  • Evaluated quality of life and psychological distress using standardized questionnaires.
  • Radiofrequency ablation patients reported higher functional scores and lower anxiety and depression levels compared to those receiving TACE, HAIC, or immunotherapy.
  • Older age and advanced disease stage correlated with poorer overall health.
  • Female gender and disease recurrence were associated with lower functional status.

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is associated with high mortality and imposes substantial symptom and psychological burdens; however, the impact of different treatment modalities on quality of life (QoL) and mental health remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine the associations among symptom distress, depression, and QoL across various HCC treatments. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 101 inpatients at a regional hospital in Taiwan (October 2020–December 2021). Patients received hepatic resection (HR), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), or immunotherapy (IT). Data were collected using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Brief Symptom Rating Scale (BSRS). Results RFA patients reported better functional scores (96.13 ± 7.55) and lower HADS scores (18.31 ± 4.92) than those treated with TACE, HAIC, or IT (function: 87.77 ± 17.77; HADS: 23.26 ± 7.66). These differences may reflect earlier disease stage and better baseline health in RFA recipients. Older age and advanced stage were associated with poorer global health ( p < 0.05), while female gender ( β = − 7.38, p = 0.014) and disease recurrence ( β = − 6.48, p = 0.019) were associated with lower functional status. Significance of results Treatment type, disease stage, and demographics significantly shape QoL and mental health in HCC patients. Minimally invasive therapies like RFA may preserve QoL in early-stage disease, while invasive or palliative treatments necessitate greater psychosocial support.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tsai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828b90fc35cd7a8848754https://doi.org/10.1017/s1478951526101758
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper