PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Artificial Intelligence in Architecture: A Critical Analysis of Automation's Limitations in the Core of Architectural Thought

RFReem Abou Fakhr

Key Points

  • This research critically analyzes the limitations of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within architectural design, emphasizing its philosophical and technical boundaries.
  • Conducted a critical literature review on AI in architecture.
  • Analyzed the implications of design theory on AI applications.
  • Evaluated the distinction between human and AI-generated architectural concepts.
  • AI demonstrated efficiency in automation and optimization but falters in capturing design intent.
  • Critical limitations of AI include a lack of consciousness, imagination, and understanding of space.
  • Human architects are essential for creating thoughtful and contextually aware designs.

Abstract

The field of architecture has undergone a radical transformation with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, which have proven efficient in automation and technical optimization. However, this research aims to provide an in-depth critical analysis, emphasizing that architecture transcends mere graphic representation or functional solutions to be a human and intellectual act. The study discusses the fundamental shortcomings of AI in grasping design vision and perceiving space, drawing upon theories of Genius Loci and the embodied experience of buildings. It concludes that AI remains a generative tool lacking consciousness and intent, making the human architect the sole conscious thinker who produces logical, well-considered designs that respect the uniqueness of each project according to its requirements, standards, and engineering principles. The research adopts an objective stance, acknowledging the tool's power while defining its philosophical and technical limits, especially AI's inability to match the designer's imagination by 100%, in addition to its deficiencies in bearing legal responsibility and understanding the behavioral and social dimensions of space.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Reem Abou Fakhr (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828cb0fc35cd7a88488bfhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18511642
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper