PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Brain and Behavior0 citationsOpen Access

Changes in Spinal Neural Circuit Plasticity in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Transection Model

View Full Paper
KKKatsuyuki KONISHITIToru IWAHASHITKTaisuke Kasuya

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the changes in spinal neural circuit plasticity following sciatic nerve transection in rats.
  • Utilized a rat model for sciatic nerve transection (SNT)
  • Compared changes in lumbar spinal cord plasticity at 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-SNT to a control group (Sham)
  • Employed neural tracers and immunohistochemistry for analysis of CST axons, motor neurons, and CINs
  • No significant changes in CST axonal number and volume after SNT were observed
  • Motor neuron cell-body volume decreased by 29% at 6 weeks post-SNT
  • Vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGlut1) synaptic inputs decreased by 82-93% from 2 weeks post-SNT
  • CINs observed increased vGlut1 synaptic inputs (98%-68%) in lateral locations after SNT
  • Medial CINs showed a 44% reduction in cell numbers and a simultaneous 107% increase in vGlut1 inputs at 6 weeks post-SNT

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background and Aim Changes in neural plasticity crucially modulate functional recovery after central nerve injury. To describe morphological peripheral nerve injury‐related changes, we comprehensively elucidated post‐sciatic nerve transection (post‐SNT) plasticity changes in the lumbar spinal corticospinal tract (CST), motor neurons, and cholinergic interneurons (CINs). Methods In a rat SNT model, we compared post‐SNT changes in lumbar spinal cord plasticity at 2, 4, and 6 weeks with those in the Sham group. Using neural tracers and immunohistochemistry, we labeled and analyzed the CST axonal number and volume, motor neuron cell‐body volume and synaptic inputs, and cholinergic interneuron (CIN) (medial and lateral, based on the distance from the central canal) number and synaptic inputs. Results Compared to the Sham group, the SNT groups showed no significant post‐SNT changes in CST axonal number and volume. Motor neuron cell‐body volume decreased by 29% at 6 weeks post‐SNT, and vesicular glutamate transporter 1 (vGlut1) and vesicular acetylcholine transporter (vAchT) synaptic inputs decreased by 82–93% and 27–42%, respectively, from 2 weeks post‐SNT onward. From 2 weeks post‐SNT onward, cell numbers were maintained, although vGlut1 synaptic inputs increased by 98%–68% in lateral CINs. At 6 weeks post‐SNT, a 44% reduction in cell numbers and a simultaneous 107% increase in vGlut1 synaptic inputs were noted in medial CINs. Conclusion Following SNT, although CST axonal numbers remained unchanged, plasticity changes were observed in motor neurons and in CINs. CINs exhibited distinct plasticity changes depending on their localization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

KONISHI et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988290a0fc35cd7a884900bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71256
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Peripheral Nerve Reconstruction after Injury: A Review of Clinical and Experimental Therapies2014 · 1,068 citations
  2. 2Neural plasticity after peripheral nerve injury and regeneration2007 · 878 citations
  3. 3Effects of Taxol on Regeneration in a Rat Sciatic Nerve Transection Model2017 · 20 citations
  4. 4Sciatic nerve injury alters the spatial arrangement of neurons and glial cells in the anterior horn of the spinal cord2019 · 16 citations
  5. 5Contralesional Axonal Remodeling of the Corticospinal System in Adult Rats After Stroke and Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Treatment2008 · 115 citations