PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Sensors0 citationsOpen Access

Characteristics of Reservoir Boundary Ranging with While-Drilling Impulse Sound Source

HSHaiyan ShangSGSen Gao

Key Points

  • To develop a method for accurately measuring reservoir boundary distance using a drill-attached impulse sound source.
  • Used a drill-attached impulse sound source with a reflector for distance measurement.
  • Constructed a reservoir model using COMSOL Multiphysics for simulations.
  • Analyzed reflector dimensions and calculated relative ranging error at various distances and dip angles.
  • Verified the method's effectiveness with actual geological parameters.
  • Achieved a minimum relative ranging error of 2.1% for the reservoir boundary at a distance of 7 m.
  • Relative error decreased with smaller dip angles and source distances.
  • When the dip angle ranged between [-20, 20] degrees, the relative error remained below 15%.
  • Simulations confirmed good ranging precision with actual formation parameters.

Abstract

Reservoir boundary distance measurement is a key technology in geosteering drilling. In this field, it is difficult to balance detection precision and depth. This paper proposes a method to measure reservoir boundary distance using a drill-attached impulse sound source equipped with a reflector. The COMSOL Multiphysics (COMSOL) is used to construct a while-drilling reservoir model with a reflector and verify the model’s effectiveness through the real-axis integration method. Under this model, the dimensions of the reflector are analyzed, the relative ranging error under different distances is calculated, and source distance combinations and reservoir interface dip angles are considered. Moreover, the effectiveness of this method is verified through the results of ranging for two sets of actual geological parameters. These results show that the rotating parabolic reflector (depth 45 mm, opening radius 12.2 mm) has a good energy bunching effect. When the dominant excitation frequency of the sound source is 8 kHz, and the source distance combination is 2 m and 4 m, the minimum relative ranging error for the reservoir boundary at 7 m is 2.1%. The relative error becomes smaller when the reservoir boundary dip angle and source distance are smaller. When the source distance is 2 m or 7 m, and the dip angle is between −20, 20 degrees, the relative error is below 15%. Simulations with actual formation parameters indicate that the proposed method attains good ranging precision.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988290a0fc35cd7a88491cchttps://doi.org/10.3390/s26031035
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Analysis of infrasound measurement of liquid levels during drilling: a numerical study2024
  2. 2Factors Influencing Radiation Sound Fields in Logging While Drilling Using an Acoustic Dipole Source2024
  3. 3Improving Drilling Safety and Efficiency with 100% Reservoir Exposure in a Challenging Low Resistivity Mature Reservoir Associated with Structural and Geological Uncertainties by Integrating Extra Deep Azimuthal Resistivity Technology in a Source-Less Solution - A Case Study From UAE Offshore2024
  4. 4Placing the Wellbore in Complex Geological Succession Covering the Maximum Reservoir Contacts2024
  5. 5Analysis and testing of the detection performance of an ultra-deep azimuthal electromagnetic logging-while-drilling tool2025