PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Frailty, Nutrition, and Quality of Life in Urban-DwellingOlder Adults Facing Vulnerability: Observational Study inPrimary Heath Care Settings in Underpopulated Areas

View Full Paper
KRKalyne RochaLALarissa AlmeidaNANathaly Andrade

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore how frailty and nutrition impact vulnerability and Quality of Life in older adults.
  • Conducted a cross-sectional observational study with community-dwelling older adults in urban areas.
  • Recruited 323 individuals receiving care in Primary Health Care settings in Brazil.
  • Used instruments like VES-13, MNA, EFS, and SF-36 for data collection.
  • Performed association analyses and binary logistic regression to assess predictive relationships.
  • Frailty was identified as the strongest predictor of vulnerability with an odds ratio of 1.35.
  • Functional independence and performance significantly increased vulnerability odds (OR = 3.9 and 3.21, respectively).
  • Impaired nutrition consistently associated with lower vulnerability (OR = 0.82).
  • Quality of Life correlated strongly with vulnerability, especially in physical domains.

Abstract

To investigate the predictive relationships between frailty, nutritional factors, and Quality of Life (QoL) on the vulnerability of older adults enrolled in Primary Health Care (PHC) in an urban area. This was a cross-sectional study conducted with community-dwelling older adults. Participants receiving care in PHC in two Brazilian municipalities located in a sparsely populated region were recruited. The instruments used were Vulnerable Elders Survey (VES-13), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). Association analyses, Spearman's correlation, and binary logistic regression were used. A total of 323 individuals were included. Binary logistic regression revealed frailty (EFS) as the main predictor of vulnerability (R2 = 0.20; p < 0.001; OR = 1.35 95% CI: 1.24-1.48), with functional independence (R2 = 0.25; p < 0.001; OR = 3.9 95% CI: 2.74-5.73) and functional performance (R2 = 0.17; p < 0.001; OR = 3.21 95% CI: 2.21-4.67) being the domains that most strongly increased the odds of vulnerability. Impaired nutrition showed a consistent predictive association (R2 = 0.11; p < 0.001; OR = 0.82 95% CI: 0.76-0.89). Frailty and poor nutritional status were predictors of vulnerability, with particular emphasis on physical-functional aspects. QoL showed a moderate to strong correlation with vulnerability, especially in the physical domains.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rocha et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988291e0fc35cd7a8849359https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.7023
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper