PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Comparison of GRACE, HEART and TIMI Risks to predict in hospital outcomes among the NSTEMI patients

View Full Paper
MCM D ChowdhuryFMF A Z I L A MalikMKM D Kalimuddin

Key Result

In NSTEMI patients, GRACE and HEART scores predicted in-hospital death (AUC 0.90, 0.89) and cardiogenic shock better than TIMI score (AUC 0.84 death).

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the performance of GRACE, HEART, and TIMI risk scores in predicting in-hospital outcomes among NSTEMI patients.
  • Conducted a prospective, observational, single-center study over one year.
  • Included 588 NSTEMI patients admitted with chest pain.
  • Collected demographic information and variables for risk score calculations.
  • Utilized GRACE, HEART, and TIMI scoring systems to classify risk and assess outcomes.
  • Mean age of participants was 57.9 years with a majority being male (70.4%).
  • 35.7% of patients experienced acute left ventricular failure (ALVF), while 6.6% had cardiogenic shock.
  • GRACE and HEART scores showed higher predictive accuracy for ALVF (AUC 0.78) compared to TIMI (AUC 0.68).
  • For cardiogenic shock, GRACE achieved AUC 0.78, HEART 0.70, TIMI 0.67, showing significant differences.
  • For in-hospital death, GRACE had AUC 0.90, HEART 0.89, and TIMI 0.84, indicating strong predictive performance.

Structured PICO

Do the GRACE and HEART risk scores better predict in-hospital outcomes compared to the TIMI risk score in patients with NSTEMI?

P
Population
588 patients admitted with chest pain and diagnosed as NSTEMI, mean age 57.9±11.2 years, 70.4% male.
I
Intervention
Risk assessment using GRACE and HEART scores
C
Comparator
Risk assessment using TIMI score
O
Outcome
In-hospital outcomes including acute left ventricular failure (ALVF), arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, and deathhard clinical

In patients with NSTEMI, the HEART and GRACE risk scores demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for in-hospital outcomes, including death and cardiogenic shock, compared to the TIMI risk score.

Abstract

Abstract Background A major component of ACS, Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), has more than twice the incidence compared to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, NSTEMI patients have a large range of clinical consequences, from minimal sequelae to early death. Risk assessment was crucial in guiding therapeutic decision-making. Three well-known risk scores are the GRACE score, the HEART score and the TIMI score. Purpose To compare the performance of the GRACE, HEART and TIMI scores in predicting the in hospital outcome among the NSTEMI patients Methods This prospective, observational, single-center study, was conducted for one year (November ,23 to October,24). Total 588 patients who admitted with Chest pain respectively; p 0.001. For Cardiogenic shock, The AUC of GRACE, HEART, and TIMI 0.78(95%CI 0.71-0.86), versus 0.70 (95% CI 0.63-0.77) versus 0.67(95%CI 0.59-0.76)); respectively; p 0.001. For in hospital Death, The AUC of GRACE, HEART, and TIMI score are 0.90(95%CI 0.874-0.940), versus 0.89 (95% CI 0.84-0.94) versus 0.84 (95% CI 0.820-0.923); respectively; p 0.001 (all differences in AUC highly statistically significant). Conclusion In patients with NSTEMI, the HEART and GRACE risk scores can better predict in hospital outcome than the TIMI risk score.ROC curve for prection of ALVF ROC curve for prediction of Death

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chowdhury et al. (2025) studied this question. In NSTEMI patients, GRACE and HEART scores predicted in-hospital death (AUC 0.90, 0.89) and cardiogenic shock better than TIMI score (AUC 0.84 death).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698829410fc35cd7a8849645https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.2137
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper