Axiomatic System Analysis: General Evolution Theory According to "Section Zero" Framework Standards

Title: Axiomatic System Analysis: General Evolution Theory According to "Section Zero" Framework Standards Author: BÉO - Independent Researc Framework: Section Zero - Minimal Scientific Validation Framework (DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18091473) Summary: This study applies the Section Zero Framework to systematically analyze the 5 foundational axioms of general evolution theory (Darwin 1859, Neo-Darwinism ~1940s) based on >2000 peer-reviewed studies and official databases (NCBI, ENCODE, PubMed). Results: Micro-evolution is robustly validated (95%+ reliability, >1000 studies). Macro-evolution lacks direct experimental verification (30-50% reliability) - Lenski's 35-year experiment spanning 75,000 generations has not produced a new species. Common descent is based only on 2-5% of the genome; 95-98% regulatory regions remain uncompared (20-40% reliability). Key Findings: 4 logical contradictions - (1) Genes 98.8% similar but morphology 90% different, (2) Selection robustly validated but fails to create new species, (3) Amazon (no isolation) has 40,000+ species vs isolated islands with few dozen species, (4) Cannot distinguish "common descent" from "common requirement." Contribution: First application of "domain of validity" methodology to biology - asking "WHEN is this still valid?" instead of absolute "right/wrong." Provides roadmap for responsible research. Warning: Includes ethical appendix (13 pages) on risks of gene editing in regulatory genome. Author disclaims all responsibility for misuse. Declaration: No judgment of right/wrong, no religious/political agenda. Purpose: enhance scientific transparency. License: CC BY 4.0 - only this paper Replicability: Process 90%, Insight 10-20% Contact: beo@beolabs.org