PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026National Science Review4 citationsOpen Access

Carry-over effects between spring and autumn phenology differ among the World’s biomes

View Full Paper
ZWZhaofei WuYFYongshuo H FuTCThomas W. Crowther

Key Points

  • The aim is to understand how the start (SOS) and end (EOS) of growing seasons interrelate across different biomes under climate warming.
  • Analyzed MODIS satellite-derived phenology data for seasonal vegetation.
  • Used European ground observations specifically for deciduous tree species.
  • Examined the predictive relationships between SOS and EOS across various biomes.
  • Earlier SOS typically advances EOS by 0.19 days per day using MODIS data.
  • EOS influences SOS more weakly, with only a 7.9% prediction rate for SOS.
  • SOS was the best predictor of EOS in 34% of analyzed pixels.
  • A dampening effect was observed where increasing one carry-over effect reduced the other.

Abstract

Abstract Climate warming alters the start (SOS) and end (EOS) of growing seasons, impacting biotic interactions and biogeochemical cycles. Yet, the carry-over links between SOS and EOS remain poorly understood, limiting future projections. Using MODIS satellite-derived phenology data for seasonal vegetation and European ground observations for deciduous tree species, we show that an earlier SOS typically advances the EOS (on average by 0.19 ± 0.001 days per day MODIS and 0.10 ± 0.002 days per day ground), while EOS exerts a weaker influence on subsequent SOS. The SOS-to-EOS effect often outweighed abiotic factors, with SOS emerging as the best predictor of EOS in 34% of pixels (β = 0.27). When predicting SOS, EOS was the primary predictor in only 7.9% of pixels, while preseason temperature dominated in 58% (β = -0.33). More importantly, we identified a dampening interaction, where an increase in one carry-over effect reduced the other. Thus, the SOS-to-EOS effect was twice as strong as the EOS-to-SOS effect in temperate deciduous forests, while the EOS-to-SOS effect was up to three times stronger in boreal taiga and tundra. This likely reflects developmental (cell and tissue growth) and stress-related constraints (SOS-to-EOS effect), as well as chilling requirements (EOS-to-SOS effect at high latitudes). These findings highlight how physiological feedbacks affect phenological responses to climate change, emphasizing the need to integrate plant-internal carry-over effects into future ecosystem models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979c8f0ec2af6756e7b4ehttps://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwag082
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper