PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Medicine1 citationsOpen Access

Safety and efficacy of protamine use during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper
SKSajjad Ahmed KhanMindanao University of Science and TechnologySPSurya Bahadur ParajuliAMAnurag Marasini

Key Result

Protamine during TAVI reduced blood transfusions by 30% (OR 0.70), major bleeding by 46% (OR 0.54), life-threatening bleeding by 67% (OR 0.33), and major vascular complications by 56% (OR 0.44).

Key Points

  • The research aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protamine compared to placebo in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of published studies on protamine use during TAVI.
  • Primary outcomes included transfusion requirements, major and life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complications.
  • Secondary outcomes assessed included acute kidney injury and 30-day mortality.
  • Odds ratios (ORs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models.
  • Protamine significantly reduced blood transfusion needs (OR = 0.70).
  • Major bleeding risk was lowered (OR = 0.54), along with life-threatening bleeding (OR = 0.33).
  • Protamine also reduced major vascular complications (OR = 0.44).
  • No significant differences observed for acute kidney injury or 30-day mortality.

Structured PICO

Does protamine administration reduce bleeding and vascular complications in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?

P
Population
Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)
I
Intervention
Protamine administration to reverse unfractionated heparin
C
Comparator
Placebo
O
Outcome
Transfusion requirements, major and life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complicationssafety

Protamine reversal of heparin during TAVI significantly reduces transfusion requirements, major bleeding, and major vascular complications without increasing adverse events like stroke or mortality.

Abstract

Background: Bleeding and vascular complications are key safety concerns during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Protamine is routinely administered to reverse unfractionated heparin, yet its efficacy and safety profile remain debated, particularly regarding its influence on bleeding, vascular, and renal outcomes. Methods: A meta-analysis of published studies comparing protamine with placebo during TAVI was conducted. Primary outcomes included transfusion requirements, major and life-threatening bleeding, and major vascular complications. Secondary outcomes were acute kidney injury, cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, minor vascular complications, and 30-day mortality. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models, and heterogeneity was assessed with the I 2 statistic. Results: Protamine administration significantly reduced the need for blood transfusion (OR = 0.70; 95% CI 0.55–0.88; P = .00; I 2 = 0%), major bleeding (OR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.31–0.92; P = .02; I 2 = 42.6%), life-threatening bleeding (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.87; P = .03; I 2 = 26.8%), and major vascular complications (OR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.28–0.67; P = .00; I 2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in any bleeding (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.50–1.36; P = .45), acute kidney injury (OR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.61–1.07; P = .14), cerebrovascular events (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.43–1.59; P = .56), myocardial infarction (OR = 0.47; 95% CI 0.08–2.90; P = .42), minor vascular complications (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.51–1.15; P = .19), or 30-day mortality (OR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.68–1.85; P = .65). Heterogeneity was minimal across most analyses ( I 2 < 50%). Conclusion: Protamine reversal of heparin during TAVI appears safe and confers significant protective effects against transfusion requirements, bleeding, and major vascular complications, supporting its routine use in the absence of contraindications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khan et al. (2026) studied this question. Protamine during TAVI reduced blood transfusions by 30% (OR 0.70), major bleeding by 46% (OR 0.54), life-threatening bleeding by 67% (OR 0.33), and major vascular complications by 56% (OR 0.44).

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979f5f0ec2af6756e813dhttps://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000047578
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Use of protamine sulfate during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation – a preliminary assessment of administration rate and impact on complications2020 · 13 citations
  2. 2Thromboembolic and Bleeding Complications in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insights on Mechanisms, Prophylaxis and Therapy2019 · 52 citations
  3. 3Management of Severe Bleeding in Patients Treated With Oral Anticoagulants2019 · 23 citations
  4. 4Peri-procedural variables and outcomes of long-period hemodynamic instability after carotid artery angioplasty and stenting2022 · 10 citations
  5. 5The TAVI Dilemma: Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve–Interpreting Current Evidence for Personalized Valve Selection2025 · 7 citations