PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 20262 citationsOpen Access

The Effect of Family Ownership on Overall, Firm-Level, and Market-Level Corporate Transparency

ECEuikyu ChoiJCJongmoo Jay ChoiMKMoo Sung Kim

Key Points

  • The research aims to understand how family ownership influences corporate transparency at different levels.
  • Analyzed data from Korean-listed companies between 2001 and 2007
  • Constructed indices for voluntary disclosure and market assessment of information quality
  • Examined relationships between family ownership levels and transparency outcomes
  • Family ownership correlates positively with voluntary disclosure efforts.
  • Market participants assess information quality negatively related to family ownership.
  • No significant relationship between family ownership and overall corporate transparency in aggregate.
  • Firms with less than 30% family ownership show positive transparency associations, while those above do not.

Abstract

We examine how family ownership shapes overall corporate transparency by analyzing both firm-level and market-level transparency. Drawing on data from Korean-listed companies between 2001 and 2007, we construct separate indices measuring voluntary disclosure by firms, information quality as assessed by market participants, and overall transparency combining both dimensions. Our analysis uncovers a striking paradox: while family ownership positively correlates with firm-initiated disclosure efforts, it negatively relates to market participants’ assessment of information quality. These opposing forces result in no significant relationship between family ownership and aggregate transparency. However, when we partition our sample by ownership levels, firms with family stakes below 30% show significantly positive transparency associations, while those above this threshold exhibit no significant relationship. We interpret these patterns as reflecting a genuine commitment by family owners to enhanced disclosure that is systematically discounted by markets, with this skepticism becoming more pronounced as family control intensifies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698acb097c832249c30baa8ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm19020127
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evolving Transparency: How Family Control Shapes <scp>ESG</scp> Disclosure Across Corporate Life Cycle2025
  2. 2Socio Emotional Wealth Approach and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure in Indonesia2024
  3. 3Risk or Reward? Assessing the Market Value Implications of CSR Disclosure and Family Ownership2026
  4. 4Handprints, Footprints, and Families: How Ownership Shapes Global Impact2026
  5. 5Family ownership as a boundary condition in the relationship between executive overconfidence and ESG disclosure: evidence from GCC family firms2026 · 1 citations